» Articles » PMID: 11344289

Disrupting Evolutionary Processes: the Effect of Habitat Fragmentation on Collared Lizards in the Missouri Ozarks

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2001 May 10
PMID 11344289
Citations 38
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Humans affect biodiversity at the genetic, species, community, and ecosystem levels. This impact on genetic diversity is critical, because genetic diversity is the raw material of evolutionary change, including adaptation and speciation. Two forces affecting genetic variation are genetic drift (which decreases genetic variation within but increases genetic differentiation among local populations) and gene flow (which increases variation within but decreases differentiation among local populations). Humans activities often augment drift and diminish gene flow for many species, which reduces genetic variation in local populations and prevents the spread of adaptive complexes outside their population of origin, thereby disrupting adaptive processes both locally and globally within a species. These impacts are illustrated with collared lizards (Crotaphytus collaris) in the Missouri Ozarks. Forest fire suppression has reduced habitat and disrupted gene flow in this lizard, thereby altering the balance toward drift and away from gene flow. This balance can be restored by managed landscape burns. Some have argued that, although human-induced fragmentation disrupts adaptation, it will also ultimately produce new species through founder effects. However, population genetic theory and experiments predict that most fragmentation events caused by human activities will facilitate not speciation, but local extinction. Founder events have played an important role in the macroevolution of certain groups, but only when ecological opportunities are expanding rather than contracting. The general impact of human activities on genetic diversity disrupts or diminishes the capacity for adaptation, speciation, and macroevolutionary change. This impact will ultimately diminish biodiversity at all levels.

Citing Articles

The macro-eco-evolutionary interplay between dispersal, competition and landscape structure in generating biodiversity.

Hagen O, Viana D, Wiegand T, Chase J, Onstein R Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024; 379(1907):20230140.

PMID: 38913052 PMC: 11391298. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0140.


Adaptive generalization in pollination systems: Hawkmoths increase fitness to long-tubed flowers, but secondary pollinators remain important.

Wenzell K, Zhang J, Skogen K, Fant J Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(5):e11443.

PMID: 38783846 PMC: 11112297. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.11443.


Increasing the planting density of (Lindl.) Schlt increased root biomass and cryptolepine yield.

Amissah J, Opoku-Agyemang F, Asem F, Osei-Safo D, Addae-Mensah I Heliyon. 2024; 10(10):e30932.

PMID: 38770341 PMC: 11103527. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30932.


Integration of genomic and ecological methods inform management of an undescribed, yet highly exploited, sardine species.

Coelho J, Mendes L, Di Dario F, Carvalho P, Dias R, Lima S Proc Biol Sci. 2024; 291(2018):20232746.

PMID: 38444338 PMC: 10915539. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2023.2746.


Immunogenetic-pathogen networks shrink in Tome's spiny rat, a generalist rodent inhabiting disturbed landscapes.

Fleischer R, Eibner G, Schwensow N, Pirzer F, Paraskevopoulou S, Mayer G Commun Biol. 2024; 7(1):169.

PMID: 38341501 PMC: 10858909. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-024-05870-x.


References
1.
Gerber A, Templeton A . Population sizes and within-deme movement of Trimerotropis saxatilis (Acrididae), a grasshopper with a fragmented distribution. Oecologia. 2017; 105(3):343-350. DOI: 10.1007/BF00328737. View

2.
Wade M, Goodnight C . PERSPECTIVE: THE THEORIES OF FISHER AND WRIGHT IN THE CONTEXT OF METAPOPULATIONS: WHEN NATURE DOES MANY SMALL EXPERIMENTS. Evolution. 2017; 52(6):1537-1553. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb02235.x. View

3.
Peck S, Ellner S, Gould F . A SPATIALLY EXPLICIT STOCHASTIC MODEL DEMONSTRATES THE FEASIBILITY OF WRIGHT'S SHIFTING BALANCE THEORY. Evolution. 2017; 52(6):1834-1839. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb02260.x. View

4.
Caro T, Laurenson M . Ecological and genetic factors in conservation: a cautionary tale. Science. 1994; 263(5146):485-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.8290956. View

5.
OBrien S, Roelke M, Marker L, Newman A, Winkler C, Meltzer D . Genetic basis for species vulnerability in the cheetah. Science. 1985; 227(4693):1428-34. DOI: 10.1126/science.2983425. View