» Articles » PMID: 11343178

Surgery and Prognostic Factors for Gastric Stromal Tumor

Overview
Journal World J Surg
Publisher Wiley
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2001 May 9
PMID 11343178
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Morphologic studies of gastric stromal tumors (GSTs) indicate that mitotic counts (MCs) and tumor size are major discriminants predictive of biologic behavior. The purpose of this study is to improve the understanding of GST behavior, including the prognostic factors and surgical treatment of GSTs. A retrospective analysis (1990--1997) of the clinical course for 116 patients with GSTs was completed, with a median follow-up of 43 months. Tumors were categorized as malignant GSTs (n = 17) when the MC was > 5/50 high-power fields (HPF) and the size > 5 cm or as benign GSTs (n = 99) when the MC was < or = 5/50 HPF and the size < or = 5 cm, MC < or = 5/50 HPF and size > 5 cm, or MC > 5/50 HPF and size < or = 5 cm. None of 99 benign tumors recurred or metastasized, whereas 7 of 17 malignant tumors recurred. MCs had a close correlation with tumor size. Immunohistochemical studies using CD34, smooth muscle actin, S-100 protein, and synaptophysin have shown positive rates of 61%, 33%, 14%, and 3%, respectively. Smooth muscle actin reactivity was more common in the benign tumors (p = 0.046) and synaptophysin reactivity in the malignant tumors (p = 0.010). Univariate analysis showed that the following clinicopathologic factors were potentially related to poor survival of patients: (1) MC > 5/50 HPF (p = 0.0001); (2) severe pleomorphism (p = 0.0062); (3) necrosis (p = 0.0173); (4) marked cellularity (p = 0.0112); (5) presence of ulceration of overlying gastric mucosa (p = 0.0091); (6) tumor size > 5 cm (p = 0.0195); and (7) exogastric growth pattern (p = 0.0344). Tumors with MC > 5/50 HPF and size > 5 cm were found to be strong indicators of an unfavorable prognosis. The type of surgery and tumor site did not affect the prognosis of the patients.

Citing Articles

Nomogram for Predicting Risk of Esophagogastric Junction (EGJ) Resection During Laparoscopic Resection of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors in EGJ: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.

Xu Y, Luo L, Feng X, Zheng Y, Chen T, Zhou R Front Surg. 2021; 8:712984.

PMID: 34708070 PMC: 8544638. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.712984.


Evaluation of the result of single-incision laparoscopic surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the stomach.

Tatara T, Kanaji S, Suzuki S, Ishida R, Hasegawa H, Yamamoto M Surg Case Rep. 2019; 5(1):50.

PMID: 30927094 PMC: 6441062. DOI: 10.1186/s40792-019-0605-x.


Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: advances in surgical and pharmacological management options.

Thacoor A J Gastrointest Oncol. 2018; 9(3):573-578.

PMID: 29998023 PMC: 6006032. DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2018.01.10.


The role of hemoclips reinforcement in the ligation-assisted endoscopic enucleation for small GISTs in gastric fundus.

Nan G, Siyu S, Sheng W, Xiang L, Jintao G Biomed Res Int. 2014; 2014:247602.

PMID: 24895557 PMC: 4033522. DOI: 10.1155/2014/247602.


Successful laparoscopic gastric resection and safe introduction of a single-incision technique for gastric submucosal tumors located near the esophagogastric junction.

Kanaji S, Nakamura T, Yamamoto M, Imanishi T, Suzuki S, Tanaka K Surg Today. 2014; 45(2):209-14.

PMID: 24875467 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-014-0940-2.