» Articles » PMID: 11332225

Perception of Quality of Life by Patients, Partners and Treating Physicians

Overview
Journal Qual Life Res
Date 2001 May 3
PMID 11332225
Citations 84
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The objective of the study was to determine possible differences in perception of quality of life (QoL) between patients with metastatic breast or prostate cancer, their partners, and the treating physician. Patients with metastatic breast cancer (n = 71), and metastatic prostate cancer (n = 29), a partner, and the physician each completed the same QoL questionnaire indicating how they perceived the patient's QoL. The European organization for research and treatment of cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 questionnaire was used to assess patients with breast cancer and the modified prostate cancer specific quality of life instrument (PROSQOLI) for patients with prostate cancer. There was reasonable agreement in mean scores between patients, and physicians or partners, for many domains of QoL; however, there was substantial discordance between scores when considering individual patients. For patients with metastatic breast cancer, physicians systematically underestimated overall QoL (p = 0.0002), social functioning (p = 0.001), and role functioning (p = 0.008), while partners showed better agreement. With prostate cancer physicians tended to underestimate pain, while mean scores for spouses were more concordant. There is substantial variability between ratings of QoL by physicians or partners, as compared to patient ratings. Medical decisions should be based on information about QoL provided by patients using validated methods.

Citing Articles

Reliability and validity of the adapted Finnish version of the early onset scoliosis questionnaire (EOSQ-24).

Haapala H, Salonen A, Suominen E, Syvanen J, Repo J, Matsumoto H Spine Deform. 2024; 12(4):1137-1143.

PMID: 38578600 PMC: 11217041. DOI: 10.1007/s43390-024-00861-8.


Validation of the AO Spine CROST (Clinician Reported Outcome Spine Trauma) in the clinical setting.

Sadiqi S, de Gendt E, Muijs S, Post M, Benneker L, Holas M Eur Spine J. 2024; 33(4):1607-1616.

PMID: 38367026 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-024-08145-5.


Experts' Perceived Patient Burden and Outcomes of Knee-ankle-foot-orthoses (Kafos) Vs. Microprocessor-stance-and-swing-phase-controlled-knee-ankle-foot Orthoses (Mp-sscos).

Bruggenjurgen B, Braatz F, Greitemann B, Drewitz H, Ruetz A, Schafer M Can Prosthet Orthot J. 2023; 5(1):37795.

PMID: 37614478 PMC: 10443469. DOI: 10.33137/cpoj.v5i1.37795.


Patient quality of life and caregiver experiences in ovarian cancer: How are they related?.

Stragapede E, Petricone-Westwood D, Hales S, Galica J, Lebel S Qual Life Res. 2023; 32(12):3521-3529.

PMID: 37535264 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-023-03481-3.


Current status of patient-reported outcome measures and other subjective assessment grading tools in bladder pain syndrome.

Uguzova S, Juliebo-Jones P, Beisland C, Haq A Int Urogynecol J. 2023; 34(8):1677-1687.

PMID: 37129626 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-023-05551-z.


References
1.
. Outcomes of cancer treatment for technology assessment and cancer treatment guidelines. American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol. 1996; 14(2):671-9. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.2.671. View

2.
Bartko J . The intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of reliability. Psychol Rep. 1966; 19(1):3-11. DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1966.19.1.3. View

3.
Blazeby J, Williams M, Alderson D, Farndon J . Observer variation in assessment of quality of life in patients with oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg. 1995; 82(9):1200-3. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800820916. View

4.
Dixon J, Bird H . Reproducibility along a 10 cm vertical visual analogue scale. Ann Rheum Dis. 1981; 40(1):87-9. PMC: 1000664. DOI: 10.1136/ard.40.1.87. View

5.
Stockler M, Osoba D, Goodwin P, Corey P, Tannock I . Responsiveness to change in health-related quality of life in a randomized clinical trial: a comparison of the Prostate Cancer Specific Quality of Life Instrument (PROSQOLI) with analogous scales from the EORTC QLQ-C30 and a trial specific module..... J Clin Epidemiol. 1998; 51(2):137-45. DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(97)00269-2. View