» Articles » PMID: 11318312

Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy: a Clinical Example

Overview
Journal Med Phys
Specialty Biophysics
Date 2001 Apr 25
PMID 11318312
Citations 53
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In this paper, we report on the clinical application of fully automated three-dimensional intensity modulated proton therapy, as applied to a 34-year-old patient presenting with a thoracic chordoma. Due to the anatomically challenging position of the lesion, a three-field technique was adopted in which fields incident through the lungs and heart, as well as beams directed directly at the spinal cord, could be avoided. A homogeneous target dose and sparing of the spinal cord was achieved through field patching and computer optimization of the 3D fluence of each field. Sensitivity of the resultant plan to delivery and calculational errors was determined through both the assessment of the potential effects of range and patient setup errors, and by the application of Monte Carlo dose calculation methods. Ionization chamber profile measurements and 2D dosimetry using a scintillator/CCD camera arrangement were performed to verify the calculated fields in water. Modeling of a 10% overshoot of proton range showed that the maximum dose to the spinal cord remained unchanged, but setup error analysis showed that dose homogeneity in the target volume could be sensitive to offsets in the AP direction. No significant difference between the MC and analytic dose calculations was found and the measured dosimetry for all fields was accurate to 3% for all measured points. Over the course of the treatment, a setup accuracy of +/-4 mm (2 s.d.) could be achieved, with a mean offset in the AP direction of 0.1 mm. Inhalation/exhalation CT scans indicated that organ motion in the region of the target volume was negligible. We conclude that 3D IMPT plans can be applied clinically and safely without modification to our existing delivery system. However, analysis of the calculated intensity matrices should be performed to assess the practicality, or otherwise, of the plan.

Citing Articles

Radiation Therapy for Chordomas and Chondrosarcomas of the Skull Base: Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Treatment Methods (Review).

Lemaeva A, Gulidov I Sovrem Tekhnologii Med. 2025; 15(5):44-52.

PMID: 39967912 PMC: 11832067. DOI: 10.17691/stm2023.15.5.05.


Quantification of beam size impact on intensity-modulated proton therapy with robust optimization in head and neck cancer-comparison with intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

Baba H, Hotta K, Takahashi R, Motegi K, Sugama Y, Sakae T J Radiat Res. 2024; 66(1):65-73.

PMID: 39724929 PMC: 11753836. DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrae097.


Impact of Relative Biologic Effectiveness for Proton Therapy for Head and Neck and Skull-Base Tumors: A Technical and Clinical Review.

Holtzman A, Mohammadi H, Furutani K, Koffler D, McGee L, Lester S Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(11).

PMID: 38893068 PMC: 11171304. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16111947.


Optimizing linear energy transfer distribution in intensity-modulated proton therapy using the alternating direction method of multipliers.

Fan Q, Zhang X, Dao R, Qian Y, Zhao L, Li X Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1328147.

PMID: 38482200 PMC: 10932999. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1328147.


Dosimetric Evaluation and Reproducibility of Breath-hold Plans in Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy: An Initial Clinical Experience.

Sabouri P, Molitoris J, Ranjbar M, Moreau J, Simone 2nd C, Mohindra P Adv Radiat Oncol. 2024; 9(3):101392.

PMID: 38292885 PMC: 10826160. DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101392.