Covert Attention Accelerates the Rate of Visual Information Processing

Overview

Journal Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

Specialty Science

Date 2001 Apr 20

PMID 11309485

Citations 126

Authors

M Carrasco

B McElree

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Whenever we open our eyes, we are confronted with an overwhelming amount of visual information. Covert attention allows us to select visual information at a cued location, without eye movements, and to grant such information priority in processing. Covert attention can be voluntarily allocated, to a given location according to goals, or involuntarily allocated, in a reflexive manner, to a cue that appears suddenly in the visual field. Covert attention improves discriminability in a wide variety of visual tasks. An important unresolved issue is whether covert attention can also speed the rate at which information is processed. To address this issue, it is necessary to obtain conjoint measures of the effects of covert attention on discriminability and rate of information processing. We used the response-signal speed-accuracy tradeoff (SAT) procedure to derive measures of how cueing a target location affects speed and accuracy in a visual search task. Here, we show that covert attention not only improves discriminability but also accelerates the rate of information processing.

Citing Articles

A preliminary investigation of the interaction between expectation and the reflexive allocation of covert spatial attention.

Crotty N, Massa N, Tellez D, White A, Grubb M Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):5778.

PMID: 39962116 PMC: 11833114. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-89845-w.

Attention Rhythmically Shapes Sensory Tuning.

Galas L, Donovan I, Dugue L J Neurosci. 2025; 45(7).

PMID: 39824635 PMC: 11823332. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1616-24.2024.

Color and Spatial Frequency Provide Functional Signatures of Retinotopic Visual Areas.

Loggia S, Duffield S, Braunlich K, Conway B J Neurosci. 2024; 45(2.

PMID: 39496489 PMC: 11714348. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1673-23.2024.

Optimal Visual Search with Highly Heuristic Decision Rules.

Zhang A, Geisler W ArXiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39398220 PMC: 11468152.

When visual attention is divided in the flash-lag effect.

Yook J, Hogendoorn H, Fink G, Vossel S, Weidner R J Vis. 2024; 24(9):17.

PMID: 39325434 PMC: 11437675. DOI: 10.1167/jov.24.9.17.

References

Brefczynski J, Deyoe E . A physiological correlate of the 'spotlight' of visual attention. Nat Neurosci. 1999; 2(4):370-4. DOI: 10.1038/7280. View

Shore D, Spence C, Klein R . Visual prior entry. Psychol Sci. 2001; 12(3):205-12. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00337. View

Treue S, Martinez Trujillo J . Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex. Nature. 1999; 399(6736):575-9. DOI: 10.1038/21176. View

Yeshurun Y, Carrasco M . Spatial attention improves performance in spatial resolution tasks. Vision Res. 1999; 39(2):293-306. DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(98)00114-x. View

Reed A . Speed-accuracy trade-off in recognition memory. Science. 1973; 181(4099):574-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.181.4099.574. View

Morgan M, Ward R, Castet E . Visual search for a tilted target: tests of spatial uncertainty models. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1998; 51(2):347-70. DOI: 10.1080/713755766. View

Yeshurun Y, Carrasco M . The locus of attentional effects in texture segmentation. Nat Neurosci. 2000; 3(6):622-7. DOI: 10.1038/75804. View

Kinchla R . Attention. Annu Rev Psychol. 1992; 43:711-42. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ps.43.020192.003431. View

Wolfe J . Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search. Psychon Bull Rev. 2013; 1(2):202-38. DOI: 10.3758/BF03200774. View

10.

Smith P . Attention and luminance detection: effects of cues, masks, and pedestals. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2000; 26(4):1401-20. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.26.4.1401. View

11.

Carrasco M, Eckstein M . Spatial covert attention increases contrast sensitivity across the CSF: support for signal enhancement. Vision Res. 2000; 40(10-12):1203-15. PMC: 3825514. DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00024-9. View

12.

Lu Z, Dosher B . External noise distinguishes attention mechanisms. Vision Res. 1998; 38(9):1183-98. DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00273-3. View

13.

Posner M . Orienting of attention. Q J Exp Psychol. 1980; 32(1):3-25. DOI: 10.1080/00335558008248231. View

14.

Reynolds J, DeSimone R . The role of neural mechanisms of attention in solving the binding problem. Neuron. 2000; 24(1):19-29, 111-25. DOI: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80819-3. View

15.

Martinez A, Anllo-Vento L, Sereno M, Frank L, Buxton R, Dubowitz D . Involvement of striate and extrastriate visual cortical areas in spatial attention. Nat Neurosci. 1999; 2(4):364-9. DOI: 10.1038/7274. View

16.

Enns , Di Lollo V . What's new in visual masking?. Trends Cogn Sci. 2000; 4(9):345-352. DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01520-5. View

17.

Carrasco M, Yeshurun Y . The contribution of covert attention to the set-size and eccentricity effects in visual search. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998; 24(2):673-92. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.24.2.673. View

18.

Joseph J, Chun M, Nakayama K . Attentional requirements in a 'preattentive' feature search task. Nature. 1997; 387(6635):805-7. DOI: 10.1038/42940. View

19.

Pashler H . Graded capacity-sharing in dual-task interference?. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1994; 20(2):330-42. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.20.2.330. View

20.

Reeves A, Sperling G . Attention gating in short-term visual memory. Psychol Rev. 1986; 93(2):180-206. View