» Articles » PMID: 11305086

Ability of Peripheral DXA Measurements of the Forearm to Predict Low Axial Bone Mineral Density at Menopause

Overview
Journal Osteoporos Int
Date 2001 Apr 18
PMID 11305086
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of peripheral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (pDXA) measurement of the forearm to predict low axial bone mineral density (BMD) as defined according to the WHO classification. Two hundred and thirty-four healthy women aged 45-60 years were investigated. BMD was measured at the proximal and distal radius + ulna by pDXA and at the lumbar spine and femoral neck by DXA. There was a significant but moderate correlation between peripheral and axial BMD measurements, with r values ranging from 0.4 to 0.6 (SEE: 13.5-17%). The cutoff values for the proximal and distal radius BMD that allow the identification with 95% sensitivity of postmenopausal women with either a lumbar spine or femoral neck T-score < -1, corresponded to a T-score of +0.5 (proximal radius) and +1 (distal radius). More than 90% of the whole population had a peripheral T-score below these thresholds. Using an axial T-score < or = -2.5 as the definition of abnormality reduced to 48% (proximal radius) to 66% (distal radius) the number of women who would have required DXA axial measurements (i.e., with a pDXA T-score below the cutoff value of -0.7). Of the 33 women (14%) with a proximal radius T-score < or = -2.5 (osteoporosis), only 1 had a lumbar spine and femoral neck T-score > or = -1 (normal). Conversely, of the 50% (proximal radius) to 65% (distal radius) of the women with normal forearm measurement, 5% (proximal radius) to 9% (distal radius) were found to be osteoporotic and an additional 57% (proximal radius) to 59% (distal radius) could be classified as osteopenic (T-score between -1 and -2.5) at either the lumbar spine or femoral neck. In conclusion, use of pDXA forearm measurement as a prescreening tool in early postmenopausal women should allow the direct identification of about 50% of the women with no axial osteoporosis. However, this study highlights the difficulties in using a unique T-score that could be applied to different sites to diagnose osteoporosis.

Citing Articles

The correlation between bone mineral density measured at the forearm and at the lumbar spine or femoral neck: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Papa M, Ceolin C, Simonato C, Termini G, Vilona F, Ruggiero A BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025; 26(1):151.

PMID: 39953461 PMC: 11827141. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-025-08376-7.


Forearm bone mineral density as a predictor of adjacent vertebral refracture after percutaneous kyphoplasty in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a retrospective analysis.

Wang J, Xie X, Gou Y, Wu Y, Pu H, Chen Q J Orthop Surg Res. 2024; 19(1):788.

PMID: 39581973 PMC: 11585950. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-05258-x.


Forearm T-score as a predictor of cage subsidence in patients with degenerative lumbar spine disease following posterior single-segment lumbar interbody fusion.

Pu H, Chen Q, Huang K, Zeng R, Wei P BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022; 23(1):1058.

PMID: 36471300 PMC: 9721049. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05930-5.


Utility and validation of bone mineral density measurements at forearm in predicting trabecular microarchitecture and central-site osteoporosis in aging Indian postmenopausal women-a promising surrogate?.

Gautam K, Cherian K, Kapoor N, Thomas N, Paul T Aging Med (Milton). 2022; 5(1):30-37.

PMID: 35309158 PMC: 8917263. DOI: 10.1002/agm2.12191.


Can radial bone mineral density predict spinal bone mineral density in patients with advanced Duchenne muscular dystrophy?.

Kim E, Cho H, Jung J, Lee J, Choi W, Kang S Medicine (Baltimore). 2018; 97(40):e12303.

PMID: 30290594 PMC: 6200494. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012303.