» Articles » PMID: 11302286

Antibacterial Treatment of Invasive Mechanical Ventilation-associated Pneumonia

Overview
Journal Drugs Aging
Specialties Geriatrics
Pharmacology
Date 2001 Apr 17
PMID 11302286
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Patients admitted to intensive care units (ICU) are at higher risk of acquiring nosocomial infections than patients in other hospital areas. This is the consequence of both a greater severity of illness with its implications (manipulation, invasiveness) and crossed infection from reservoirs inside the ICU. The most frequent nosocomial infection is invasive ventilation-associated pneumonia (VAP) which leads to an important increase in morbidity and mortality. The most important aetiological agents in VAP are bacteria, with a marked predominance of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. These aetiologies may be different depending upon the type of ICU (medical, surgical, coronary) or the presence of certain risk factors (duration of mechanical ventilation before onset of pneumonia, previous exposure to antibacterials). Susceptibilities of the aetiological agents to antibacterials may also vary according to the type of ICU and over time. Data from global studies show an increase in multiresistant bacteria but these data may not be applied to a local ICU. The availability of accurate and updated information on the most frequently encountered organisms in each ICU and their susceptibilities is very important in order to provide the most adequate treatment. A controversial issue is the selection of antibacterials. According to the latest evidence the most adequate approach is a prompt administration of empirical treatment. Based on knowledge of bacterial flora in our own ICU, the choice of an adequate therapeutic regimen will decrease both morbidity and mortality. A second issue is monotherapy versus combined therapy. The most common recommendation, with a few exceptions, is to use combined therapy until microbiological results are received. Another controversy is the choice of antibacterials in the combined regimen. The most commonly recommended combination is that of a beta-lactam with an aminoglycoside, except in early-onset pneumonia without risk factors. The use of monotherapy with a cefalosporin without antipseudomonal activity or amoxicillin-clavulanic acid is the recommended regimen. Treatment should be modified based on microbiological results. There are no well documented recommendations on the prophylactic duration of treatment and it must be based on the aetiological agent and the clinical course. In summary treatment of VAP must be prompt, empirical and combined (beta-lactam plus aminoglycoside ). However, the choice of the antibacterial regimen should follow local guidelines of treatment based upon the knowledge of the most frequently isolated bacterial flora and their susceptibilities in different clinical settings.

Citing Articles

[Guidelines for the management of community pneumonia in adult who needs hospitalization].

Alvarez-Rocha L, Alos J, Blanquer J, Alvarez-Lerma F, Garau J, Guerrero A Med Intensiva. 2024; 29(1):21-62.

PMID: 38620135 PMC: 7131443. DOI: 10.1016/S0210-5691(05)74199-1.


Clinical practice guidelines for hospital-acquired pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia in adults.

Rotstein C, Evans G, Born A, Grossman R, Light R, Magder S Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2009; 19(1):19-53.

PMID: 19145262 PMC: 2610276. DOI: 10.1155/2008/593289.


Antimicrobial therapy in critically ill patients: a review of pathophysiological conditions responsible for altered disposition and pharmacokinetic variability.

Pea F, Viale P, Furlanut M Clin Pharmacokinet. 2005; 44(10):1009-34.

PMID: 16176116 DOI: 10.2165/00003088-200544100-00002.


Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intravenous levofloxacin in patients with early-onset ventilator-associated pneumonia.

Pea F, Di Qual E, Cusenza A, Brollo L, Baldassarre M, Furlanut M Clin Pharmacokinet. 2003; 42(6):589-98.

PMID: 12793843 DOI: 10.2165/00003088-200342060-00008.

References
1.
Benko A, Cappelletty D, Kruse J, Rybak M . Continuous infusion versus intermittent administration of ceftazidime in critically ill patients with suspected gram-negative infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996; 40(3):691-5. PMC: 163181. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.40.3.691. View

2.
Radberg G, Nilsson L, Svensson S . Development of quinolone-imipenem cross resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa during exposure to ciprofloxacin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990; 34(11):2142-7. PMC: 172014. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.34.11.2142. View

3.
Chastre J, Trouillet J, Vuagnat A, Joly-Guillou M, Clavier H, Dombret M . Nosocomial pneumonia in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998; 157(4 Pt 1):1165-72. DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.157.4.9708057. View

4.
Kollef M, Sherman G, Ward S, Fraser V . Inadequate antimicrobial treatment of infections: a risk factor for hospital mortality among critically ill patients. Chest. 1999; 115(2):462-74. DOI: 10.1378/chest.115.2.462. View

5.
Blaser J, Stone B, Groner M, Zinner S . Comparative study with enoxacin and netilmicin in a pharmacodynamic model to determine importance of ratio of antibiotic peak concentration to MIC for bactericidal activity and emergence of resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987; 31(7):1054-60. PMC: 174871. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.31.7.1054. View