» Articles » PMID: 11298168

Patient Benefit from Functional and Cosmetic Rhinoplasty

Overview
Date 2001 Apr 12
PMID 11298168
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The Glasgow Benefit Inventory, a validated post-interventional questionnaire, was used to determine patient benefit from septorhinoplasty according to indication (function, cosmesis or a combination) in 87 patients. We showed a very significant patient benefit from this procedure and have demonstrated that the benefit is greatest when cosmesis is an indication (P = 0.05).

Citing Articles

Postoperative Functional and Cosmetic Satisfaction among Subjects Undergoing Open Versus Endonasal Septorhinoplasty: Five Years' Experience from an Open-label Study at a Tertiary Care Center in Oman.

Al Abri R, Al Bassam W, Al-Balushi F, Hlaiwah O, Jaju S, Al-Adawi S Oman Med J. 2020; 35(2):e120.

PMID: 32373349 PMC: 7186770. DOI: 10.5001/omj.2020.38.


Association Between Mental Health Status and Patient Satisfaction With the Functional Outcomes of Rhinoplasty.

Strazdins E, Nie Y, Ramli R, Palesy T, Christensen J, Alvarado R JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2018; 20(4):284-291.

PMID: 29450446 PMC: 5876902. DOI: 10.1001/jamafacial.2018.0001.


Revision rhinoplasty: measurement of patient-reported outcomes and analysis of predictive factors.

Abbas O Springerplus. 2016; 5(1):1472.

PMID: 27652047 PMC: 5009061. DOI: 10.1186/s40064-016-3166-5.


The Glasgow Benefit Inventory: a systematic review of the use and value of an otorhinolaryngological generic patient-recorded outcome measure.

Hendry J, Chin A, Swan I, Akeroyd M, Browning G Clin Otolaryngol. 2015; 41(3):259-75.

PMID: 26264703 PMC: 5912499. DOI: 10.1111/coa.12518.


Prospective study of the surgical techniques used in primary rhinoplasty on the caucasian nose and comparison of the preoperative and postoperative anthropometric nose measurements.

Berger C, Freitas R, Malafaia O, Pinto J, Macedo Filho E, Mocellin M Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015; 19(1):34-41.

PMID: 25992149 PMC: 4392525. DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1393721.