» Articles » PMID: 11281884

Is 'shared Decision-making' Feasible in Consultations for Upper Respiratory Tract Infections? Assessing the Influence of Antibiotic Expectations Using Discourse Analysis

Overview
Journal Health Expect
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Public Health
Date 2001 Apr 3
PMID 11281884
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine the discourse of consultations in which conflict occurs between parents and clinicians about the necessity of antibiotics to treat an upper respiratory tract infection. To appraise the feasibility of shared decision-making in such consultations. DESIGN: A qualitative study using discourse analysis techniques. SETTING: A general practice with 12 500 patients in an urban area of Cardiff, Wales. PARTICIPANTS: Two consultations were purposively selected from a number of audiotaped sessions. The consultations took place during normal clinics in which appointments are booked at 7-minute intervals. The practitioner is known to be interested in involving patients in treatment decisions. METHOD: Discourse analysis was employed to examine the consultation transcripts. This analysis was then compared with the theoretical competencies proposed for 'shared decision-making'. RESULTS: The consultations exhibit less rational strategies than those suggested by the shared decision-making model. Strong parental views are expressed (overtly and covertly) which seem derived from prior experiences of similar illnesses and prescribing behaviours. The clinician responds by emphasizing the 'normality' of upper respiratory tract infections and their recurrence, accompanied by expressions that antibiotic treatment is ineffective in 'viral' illness - the suggested diagnosis. The competencies of 'shared decision-making' are not exhibited. CONCLUSIONS: The current understanding of shared decision-making needs to be developed for those situations where there are dis-agreements due to the strongly held views of the participants. Clinicians have limited strategies in situations where patient treatment preferences are opposed to professional views. Dispelling 'misconceptions' by sharing information and negotiating agreed management plans are recommended. But it seems that communication skills, information content and consultation length have to receive attention if such strategies are to be employed successfully.

Citing Articles

Saving Shared Decision-Making.

Opel D, Gerstein M, Carle A, Fournier A, Hargraves I, Lafata J J Gen Intern Med. 2025; .

PMID: 39953310 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-025-09410-z.


Antimicrobial Prescription Behavior in Equine Asthma Cases: An International Survey.

van den Brom-Spierenburg A, Muresan A, Westermann C Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(3).

PMID: 38338101 PMC: 10854497. DOI: 10.3390/ani14030457.


Coping with in-locus factors and systemic contradictions affecting antibiotic prescription and dispensing practices in primary care-A qualitative One Health study in Brazil.

Silva-Brandao R, de Oliveira S, Silva Correa J, Zago L, Fracolli L, Padoveze M PLoS One. 2023; 18(1):e0280575.

PMID: 36662722 PMC: 9857971. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280575.


A Qualitative Description of Clinician Free-Text Rationales Entered within Accountable Justification Interventions.

Brown T, Zelch B, Lee J, Doctor J, Linder J, Sullivan M Appl Clin Inform. 2022; 13(4):820-827.

PMID: 36070799 PMC: 9451951. DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1756366.


Conflict Between Direct Experience and Research-Based Evidence Is a Key Challenge to Evidence-Based Respiratory Medicine on British Racing Yards.

Kinnison T, Cardwell J Front Vet Sci. 2020; 7:266.

PMID: 32537459 PMC: 7267464. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00266.


References
1.
Cockburn J, Pit S . Prescribing behaviour in clinical practice: patients' expectations and doctors' perceptions of patients' expectations--a questionnaire study. BMJ. 1997; 315(7107):520-3. PMC: 2127349. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.315.7107.520. View

2.
Coulter A . Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision-making. J Health Serv Res Policy. 1997; 2(2):112-21. DOI: 10.1177/135581969700200209. View

3.
Brock D, Wartman S . When competent patients make irrational choices. N Engl J Med. 1990; 322(22):1595-9. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199005313222209. View

4.
Lupton D . Consumerism, reflexivity and the medical encounter. Soc Sci Med. 1997; 45(3):373-81. DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00353-x. View

5.
Emanuel E, Emanuel L . Four models of the physician-patient relationship. JAMA. 1992; 267(16):2221-6. View