» Articles » PMID: 11262681

Gender and Blindness: a Meta-analysis of Population-based Prevalence Surveys

Overview
Publisher Informa Healthcare
Date 2001 Mar 23
PMID 11262681
Citations 89
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Many individual surveys of blindness have reported slightly higher rates of blindness for women. In order to gain a continent-by-continent and global sense of the burden of blindness by sex we conducted a meta-analysis of published, population-based surveys of blindness.

Method: Published reports were collected using a predetermined search protocol involving commercial electronic databases, hand-searching of references and direct contact with researchers. Studies were included that were population-based, included clinical examination and had a minimum sample size of 1000. The studies were critically appraised to determine methodological rigour. Data were analysed using the Cochrane Collaboration Review Manager.

Results: The overall odds ratio (age-adjusted) of blind women to men is 1.43 (95% CI 1.33-1.53), ranging from 1.39 (95% CI 1.20-1.61) in Africa, 1.41 (95% CI 1.29-1.54) in Asia, and 1.63 (95% CI 1.30-2.05) in industrialised countries. There was good homogeneity of findings from Africa, Asia, and the industrialised countries. Globally, women bear excess blindness compared to men. In these surveys, overall, women account for 64.5% of all blind people. The excess of blindness in women was marked among the elderly and not due only to differential life expectancy.

Conclusion: The excess burden of blindness among women is likely due to a number of factors, which are different in industrialised countries compared to developing countries. Particular attention to gender differences in blindness is needed in the creation of targets for blindness reduction and in the development of interventions.

Citing Articles

Gender-specific changes in vision-related quality of life over time - results from the population-based Gutenberg Health Study.

Hartmann A, Grabitz S, Wild P, Lackner K, Munzel T, Kerahrodi J Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2025; .

PMID: 39934353 DOI: 10.1007/s00417-025-06741-9.


Changing patterns in cataract surgery indications, outcomes, and costs, 2012-2023: a retrospective study at Aravind Eye Hospitals, India.

Gupta S, Ravilla R, Aravind H, Chandrashekharan S, Ravilla T Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2025; 33:100530.

PMID: 39895670 PMC: 11787026. DOI: 10.1016/j.lansea.2025.100530.


Macular, choroidal and disc associations across women's reproductive life stages: a scoping review from menarche to post-menopause.

Ribeiro Reis A, Ioannidou E, Stuart K, Wagner S, Foster P, Khawaja A Eye (Lond). 2025; 39(3):402-411.

PMID: 39814872 PMC: 11794579. DOI: 10.1038/s41433-025-03592-w.


"Teledentistry" using a mobile app (Telesmile) to improve oral health among the visually impaired and hearing-impaired populations in Saudi Arabia: a randomized controlled study.

Fageeh H, Mansoor M, Fageeh H, Abdul H, Khan H, Akkam A Front Oral Health. 2024; 5:1496222.

PMID: 39697789 PMC: 11652368. DOI: 10.3389/froh.2024.1496222.


Visual Outcome and Complications in White Mature Cataracts after Phacoemulsification.

Jaiswal K, Rathi R, Jain A, Gaur A, Nema N Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2024; 30(3):129-135.

PMID: 39444991 PMC: 11495291. DOI: 10.4103/meajo.meajo_100_23.