» Articles » PMID: 11258209

Guidelines As Rationing Tools: a Qualitative Analysis of Psychosocial Patient Selection Criteria for Cardiac Procedures

Overview
Journal CMAJ
Date 2001 Mar 22
PMID 11258209
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Cardiac procedure guidelines often include psychosocial criteria for selecting patients that potentially introduce social value judgements into clinical decisions and decisions about the rationing of care. The aim of this study was to investigate the terms and justifications for and the meanings of psychosocial patient characteristics used in cardiac procedure guidelines.

Methods: We selected English-language guidelines published since 1990 and chapters in textbooks published since 1989. These guidelines amalgamated multiple sources of evidence and expertise and made recommendations regarding patient selection for specific procedures. A multidisciplinary team of physicians and social scientists extracted passages regarding psychosocial criteria and developed categories and conceptual relationships to describe and interpret their content.

Results: Sixty-five papers met the criteria for inclusion in the study. Forty-five (69%) mentioned psychosocial criteria as procedure indications or contraindications. The latter fell into several categories, including behavioural and psychological issues, relationships with significant others, financial resources, social roles and environmental circumstances.

Interpretation: Psychosocial characteristics are portrayed as having 2 roles in patient selection: as risk factors intrinsic to the candidate or as indicators of need for special intervention. Guidelines typically simply list psychosocial contraindications without clarifying their specific nature or providing any justification for their use. Psychosocial considerations can help in the evaluation of patients for cardiac procedures, but they become ethically controversial when used to restrict access. The use of psychosocial indications and contraindications could be improved by more precise descriptions of the psychosocial problem at issue, explanations regarding why the criterion matters and justification of the characteristic using a biological rationale or research evidence.

Citing Articles

Setting priorities in primary health care--on whose conditions? A questionnaire study.

Arvidsson E, Andre M, Borgquist L, Andersson D, Carlsson P BMC Fam Pract. 2012; 13:114.

PMID: 23181453 PMC: 3528614. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-114.


Priority setting in primary health care - dilemmas and opportunities: a focus group study.

Arvidsson E, Andre M, Borgquist L, Carlsson P BMC Fam Pract. 2010; 11:71.

PMID: 20863364 PMC: 2955602. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-11-71.


Nonclinical factors in patient selection for surgery.

Mariotto A CMAJ. 2001; 165(2):153.

PMID: 11501452 PMC: 81280.


Psychosocial patient selection criteria in clinical practice guidelines: an ethical basis for rationing?.

Dossetor J CMAJ. 2001; 164(5):642-3.

PMID: 11258211 PMC: 80818.

References
1.
Tanenbaum S . Knowing and acting in medical practice: the epistemological politics of outcomes research. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1994; 19(1):27-44. DOI: 10.1215/03616878-19-1-27. View

2.
LINDESMITH G . Practice guidelines in cardiothoracic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 1992; 53(5):930-9. DOI: 10.1016/0003-4975(92)91477-q. View

3.
. Angioplasty standard of practice. Standards of Practice Committee of the Society of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1992; 3(2):269-71. View

4.
. Practice guidelines for pulmonary artery catheterization. A report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Pulmonary Artery Catheterization. Anesthesiology. 1993; 78(2):380-94. View

5.
Olbrisch M, Levenson J . Psychosocial evaluation of heart transplant candidates: an international survey of process, criteria, and outcomes. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1991; 10(6):948-55. View