Reliable, Valid, and Educational In-training Medical Student Evaluation Overlooked
Overview
Overview
Journal
J Gen Intern Med
Publisher
Springer
Specialty
General Medicine
Date
2001 Mar 17
PMID
11251755
Authors
Authors
Affiliations
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
References
1.
Turnbull J, MacFadyen J, Van Barneveld C, Norman G
. Clinical work sampling A new approach to the problem of in-training evaluation. J Gen Intern Med. 2000; 15(8):556-61.
PMC: 1495580.
DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.06099.x.
View
2.
Hatala R, Norman G
. In-training evaluation during an internal medicine clerkship. Acad Med. 1999; 74(10 Suppl):S118-20.
DOI: 10.1097/00001888-199910000-00059.
View
3.
Pangaro L
. A new vocabulary and other innovations for improving descriptive in-training evaluations. Acad Med. 1999; 74(11):1203-7.
DOI: 10.1097/00001888-199911000-00012.
View
4.
Hemmer P, Hawkins R, Jackson J, Pangaro L
. Assessing how well three evaluation methods detect deficiencies in medical students' professionalism in two settings of an internal medicine clerkship. Acad Med. 2000; 75(2):167-73.
DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200002000-00016.
View
5.
Lavin B, Pangaro L
. Internship ratings as a validity outcome measure for an evaluation system to identify inadequate clerkship performance. Acad Med. 1998; 73(9):998-1002.
DOI: 10.1097/00001888-199809000-00021.
View