» Articles » PMID: 11237899

The Profile of Repeated Corneal Transplantation

Overview
Journal Ophthalmology
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2001 Mar 10
PMID 11237899
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the primary indications for corneal transplantation in patients with repeated keratoplasties, graft survival, the causes and risk factors for failure.

Setting: Tertiary referral care center.

Design: Retrospective, noncomparative case series.

Methods: Charts of all patients who underwent repeated corneal transplantation between 1985 and 1998 were reviewed. Eighty patients underwent repeated corneal transplantation, of which six underwent repeated corneal transplantation in both eyes, totaling 86 eyes. A total of 208 keratoplasties were performed in this group; 86 primary and 122 repeated keratoplasties. The most common primary indications for corneal transplantation were vascularized corneal scar in 31 of the 86 eyes (36%), followed by pseudophakic and aphakic bullous keratopathy (PBK, ABK). Of the repeated transplants, 55 eyes (64%) had one repeated graft, 27 eyes (31.4%) had two repeated grafts, three (3.5%) had three repeated grafts, and one (1.2%) had four repeated transplants.

Main Outcome Measures: Final visual outcome and clarity of corneal graft.

Results: At the end of the follow-up period, 44 of the 86 eyes (51%) had clear grafts, but only 39.5% had good visual outcome. The mean survival periods of the repeated transplants decreased gradually with the number of regrafting procedures, from 14.3 to 8.7 months. The mean survival period was longer for patients with ABK, PBK, and secondary glaucoma, and shorter for patients who experienced graft ulcer or surface disorders. Graft failure was unrelated to graft size, but was associated with vascularization (P = 0.025), additional surgical procedures (P < 0.0001), and postoperative complications (P < 0.0001). There was a constant tendency for decrease in visual acuity with time. Final visual acuity was 20/20 to 20/40 in 13 of the 86 eyes (15%), 20/80 to 20/200 in 23 eyes (27%), and less than 20/200 in 50 eyes (58%). The most common complication was immune rejection, which occurred in 65 of the 208 transplants (31%), followed by secondary glaucoma in 48 eyes (23%) and cataract in 19 eyes (9%). Graft survival decreased remarkably after the third and forth regrafts, to 25% and 0%, respectively, compared with the first and second regrafts, 37% and 43%, respectively.

Conclusions: "High-risk" preoperative conditions, postoperative complications, and the need for additional surgical interventions may decrease graft survival. Close follow-up, extended use of antiinflammatory, antiviral, and immunosuppressive drugs, and avoiding additional surgical interventions as much as possible may decrease graft failure and the need for repeated keratoplasties.

Citing Articles

Repeat corneal transplantation in Southern China: Indications, surgical technique, outcomes, and risk factors for repeat keratoplasty failure.

Zheng Q, Zheng Q, Chen W, Li J, Zhao Z, Wang H Indian J Ophthalmol. 2024; 72(Suppl 3):S482-S487.

PMID: 38648456 PMC: 467028. DOI: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_3333_23.


Changing Medical Paradigm on Inflammatory Eye Disease: Technology and Its Implications for P4 Medicine.

Inomata T, Sung J J Clin Med. 2022; 11(11).

PMID: 35683352 PMC: 9181649. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11112964.


Outcomes following tacrolimus systemic immunosuppression for penetrating keratoplasty in infants and young children.

Painter S, Rana M, Barua A, Abbott J, Gupte G, Shah S Eye (Lond). 2021; 36(12):2286-2293.

PMID: 34839362 PMC: 9674676. DOI: 10.1038/s41433-021-01855-w.


Ferrara Rings for Visual Rehabilitation in Eyes with Keratoconus and Previous Cross-Linking Using the Ferrara Ring Nomogram.

McLintock C, McKelvie J, Li Y, Hamada S, Lake D Vision (Basel). 2021; 5(4).

PMID: 34698306 PMC: 8544695. DOI: 10.3390/vision5040045.


Indications and Surgical Techniques for Repeat Corneal Transplantation in Eastern China: A Twelve-Year Study.

Wan X, Yao W, Zhao S, Xu J, Le Q J Ophthalmol. 2021; 2021:5514004.

PMID: 34631163 PMC: 8497152. DOI: 10.1155/2021/5514004.