Domain Swapping and Gene Shuffling Identify Sequences Required for Induction of an Avr-dependent Hypersensitive Response by the Tomato Cf-4 and Cf-9 Proteins
Overview
Cell Biology
Authors
Affiliations
The tomato Cf-4 and Cf-9 genes confer resistance to infection by the biotrophic leaf mold pathogen Cladosporium. Their protein products induce a hypersensitive response (HR) upon recognition of the fungus-encoded Avr4 and Avr9 peptides. Cf-4 and Cf-9 share >91% sequence identity and are distinguished by sequences in their N-terminal domains A and B, their N-terminal leucine-rich repeats (LRRs) in domain C1, and their LRR copy number (25 and 27 LRRs, respectively). Analysis of Cf-4/Cf-9 chimeras, using several different bioassays, has identified sequences in Cf-4 and Cf-9 that are required for the Avr-dependent HR in tobacco and tomato. A 10-amino acid deletion within Cf-4 domain B relative to Cf-9 was required for full Avr4-dependent induction of an HR in most chimeras analyzed. Additional sequences required for Cf-4 function are located in LRRs 11 and 12, a region that contains only eight of the 67 amino acids that distinguish it from Cf-9. One chimera, with 25 LRRs that retained LRR 11 of Cf-4, induced an attenuated Avr4-dependent HR. The substitution of Cf-9 N-terminal LRRs 1 to 9 with the corresponding sequences from Cf-4 resulted in attenuation of the Avr9-induced HR, as did substitution of amino acid A433 in LRR 15. The amino acids L457 and K511 in Cf-9 LRRs 16 and 18 are essential for induction of the Avr9-dependent HR. Therefore, important sequence determinants of Cf-9 function are located in LRRs 10 to 18. This region contains 15 of the 67 amino acids that distinguish it from Cf-4, in addition to two extra LRRs. Our results demonstrate that sequence variation within the central LRRs of domain C1 and variation in LRR copy number in Cf-4 and Cf-9 play a major role in determining recognition specificity in these proteins.
Plant pattern recognition receptors: from evolutionary insight to engineering.
Snoeck S, Johanndrees O, Nurnberger T, Zipfel C Nat Rev Genet. 2024; .
PMID: 39528738 DOI: 10.1038/s41576-024-00793-z.
Exploring cotton SFR2's conundrum in response to cold stress.
Surber S, Thien Thao N, Smith C, Shomo Z, Barnes A, Roston R Plant Signal Behav. 2024; 19(1):2362518.
PMID: 38836385 PMC: 11155703. DOI: 10.1080/15592324.2024.2362518.
Genome-Wide Identification and Characterization of the Gene Family in Cucumber ( L.).
Zhang W, Yuan Q, Wu Y, Zhang J, Nie J Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(9).
PMID: 35563438 PMC: 9099878. DOI: 10.3390/ijms23095048.
Meng G, Xiao Y, Li A, Qian Z, Xie Y, Yang L Theor Appl Genet. 2022; 135(5):1637-1656.
PMID: 35217878 DOI: 10.1007/s00122-022-04059-2.
Scossa F, Fernie A Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2021; 19:1579-1594.
PMID: 33868595 PMC: 8039532. DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.03.008.