» Articles » PMID: 11218230

Criticisms of the Satiety Hypothesis As an Explanation for Within-session Decreases in Responding

Overview
Date 2001 Feb 24
PMID 11218230
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The authors of four papers recently reported that satiation provides a better explanation than habituation for within-session decreases in conditioned responding. Several arguments question this conclusion. First, the contribution of habituation to within-session changes in responding seems clearly established. Information that is consistent with habituation, but that is difficult to reconcile with satiation, is not adequately addressed. Second, the limited evidence offered in support of satiation is ambiguous because the results are just as compatible with habituation as with other satiety variables. Finally, the term satiation is used in an intuitive way that is sometimes contradicted by research about the termination of ingestion. Use of the technical term satiation in a way that differs from its conventional usage will only isolate operant psychology from other areas of psychological research.

Citing Articles

How Cues of Being Watched Promote Risk Seeking in Fund Investment in Older Adults.

Li M, Peng H Front Psychol. 2022; 12:765632.

PMID: 35095651 PMC: 8790478. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.765632.


Food reinforcement and habituation to food are processes related to initiation and cessation of eating.

Epstein L, Carr K Physiol Behav. 2021; 239:113512.

PMID: 34217735 PMC: 9632495. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2021.113512.


Understanding Operant Behavior: Still Experimental Analysis of the Three-Term Contingency.

McSweeney F, Murphy E Behav Anal. 2020; 40(1):39-47.

PMID: 31976932 PMC: 6701223. DOI: 10.1007/s40614-017-0088-7.


Habituation of reinforcer effectiveness.

Lloyd D, Medina D, Hawk L, Fosco W, Richards J Front Integr Neurosci. 2014; 7:107.

PMID: 24409128 PMC: 3885986. DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2013.00107.


Dynamic changes in reinforcer effectiveness: satiation and habituation have different implications for theory and practice.

McSweeney F Behav Anal. 2012; 27(2):171-88.

PMID: 22478427 PMC: 2755409. DOI: 10.1007/BF03393178.


References
1.
Berry S, Beatty W, Klesges R . Sensory and social influences on ice cream consumption by males and females in a laboratory setting. Appetite. 1985; 6(1):41-5. DOI: 10.1016/s0195-6663(85)80049-0. View

2.
Broster B, Rankin C . Effects of changing interstimulus interval during habituation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Behav Neurosci. 1994; 108(6):1019-29. DOI: 10.1037//0735-7044.108.6.1019. View

3.
Facon B, Darge T . Evaluation of toy variation on engagement in a leisure activity of two children with profound multiple handicaps. Psychol Rep. 1996; 79(1):203-10. DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1996.79.1.203. View

4.
Epstein L, Rodefer J, Wisniewski L, Caggiula A . Habituation and dishabituation of human salivary response. Physiol Behav. 1992; 51(5):945-50. DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(92)90075-d. View

5.
Killeen P, Hanson S, Osborne S . Arousal: its genesis and manifestation as response rate. Psychol Rev. 1978; 85(6):571-81. View