» Articles » PMID: 11212998

Collaboration in Maternity Care: a Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Community-based Continuity of Care with Standard Hospital Care

Overview
Journal BJOG
Date 2001 Feb 24
PMID 11212998
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To test whether a new community-based model of continuity of care provided by midwives and obstetricians improved maternal clinical outcomes, in particular a reduced caesarean section rate.

Design: Randomised controlled trial.

Setting: A public teaching hospital in metropolitan Sydney, Australia. Sample 1089 women randomised to either the community-based model (n = 550) or standard hospital-based care (n = 539) prior to their first antenatal booking visit at an Australian metropolitan public hospital.

Main Outcome Measures: Data were collected on onset and outcomes of labour, antenatal, intrapartum and postnatal complications, antenatal admissions to hospital and neonatal mortality and morbidity.

Results: There was a significant difference in the caesarean section rate between the groups, 13.3% (73/550) in the community-based group and 17.8% in the control group (96/539). This difference was maintained after controlling for known contributing factors to caesarean section (OR = 0.6, 95% CI 0.4-0.9, P = 0.02). There were no other significant differences in the events during labour and birth. Eighty babies (14.5%) from the community-based group and 102 (18.9%) from the control group were admitted to the special care nursery, but this difference was not significant (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.5-1.1, P = 0.12). Eight infants died during the perinatal period (four from each group), for an overall perinatal mortality rate of 7.3 per 1000 births.

Conclusion: Community-based continuity of maternity care provided by midwives and obstetricians resulted in a significantly reduced caesarean section rate. There were no other differences in clinical outcomes.

Citing Articles

Midwife continuity of care models versus other models of care for childbearing women.

Sandall J, Fernandez Turienzo C, Devane D, Soltani H, Gillespie P, Gates S Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024; 4:CD004667.

PMID: 38597126 PMC: 11005019. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub6.


Uncertainty associated with parents of preterm infants hospitalised in neonatal intensive care unit among selected governmental hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2022: an institution-based cross-sectional study.

Tilahun B, Yilak G, Amena N, Abate B, Fantahun A, Deribe L BMJ Open. 2024; 14(2):e076749.

PMID: 38417957 PMC: 10973694. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076749.


Child and maternal benefits and risks of caseload midwifery - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Wassen L, Borgstrom Bolmsjo B, Frantz S, Hagman A, Lindroth M, Rubertsson C BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023; 23(1):663.

PMID: 37715118 PMC: 10504769. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-05967-x.


Assessment of interprofessional obstetric and midwifery care from the midwives' perspective using the Interprofessional Collaboration Scale (ICS).

Schulz A, Wirtz M Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1143110.

PMID: 37284468 PMC: 10240080. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1143110.


A direct comparison of patient-reported outcomes and experiences in alternative models of maternity care in Queensland, Australia.

Miller Y, Tone J, Talukdar S, Martin E PLoS One. 2022; 17(7):e0271105.

PMID: 35819947 PMC: 9275696. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271105.