Effect of a Composite Membrane of Chitosan and Poloxamer Gel on Postoperative Adhesive Interactions
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Excessive postoperative adhesion formation is a major result of surgery. The adhesion reduction effects of a chitosan membrane and poloxamer gel barrier were measured in a rat peritoneal model. Forty-four male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into four groups (control, poloxamer, chitosan, and poloxamer+chitosan sandwich). Two cm2 of cecal serosa and the adjacent abdominal wall were abraded. The denuded cecum was covered with either a chitosan membrane, a poloxamer gel, chitosan in a sandwich configuration with poloxamer on both sides, or neither (control group) and apposed to the abdominal wall. Fourteen days after surgery adhesions were graded using a whole-number scoring system of zero to five. Adhesion strength was determined using a whole-number system of one to four. Adhesion area was measured on a continuous scale of adhesion severity. Adhesion grades were highest in the control group (5.00 +/- 0.00) and were significantly (P < 0.05) lower in the poloxamer group (3.50 +/- 1.35), the chitosan group (1.64 +/- 1.63), and the poloxamer+chitosan group (1.18 +/- 1.25). The two chitosan-containing groups also had significantly (P < 0.05) reduced adhesion grades in comparison with the poloxamer group. Adhesion area in both chitosan-containing groups was reduced in comparison with control and adhesion strength was reduced significantly (P < 0.05) in all groups compared with control. The poloxamer+chitosan group had significantly (P < 0.05) reduced adhesion strength versus poloxamer only. There was a significant (P < 0.05) linear correlation (r = 0.931, P < 0.001) between adhesion grade and adhesion strength. We conclude that chitosan and the combination of poloxamer+chitosan were shown to effectively reduce adhesion area, grade, and strength.
Liu C, Lin Z, Ruan W, Gai X, Qu Q, Wang C Sci Rep. 2024; 13(1):23108.
PMID: 38172186 PMC: 10764949. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-50425-5.
Gegel N, Shipovskaya A, Khaptsev Z, Radionov R, Belyaeva A, Kharlamov V Gels. 2022; 8(2).
PMID: 35200474 PMC: 8871199. DOI: 10.3390/gels8020093.
Jeong J, Lee D, Song S, Park Y, Kim J, Kim J PLoS One. 2019; 14(2):e0212583.
PMID: 30794612 PMC: 6386309. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212583.
Safety and Efficacy of Topical Chitogel- Deferiprone-Gallium Protoporphyrin in Sheep Model.
Ooi M, Richter K, Drilling A, Thomas N, Prestidge C, James C Front Microbiol. 2018; 9:917.
PMID: 29867828 PMC: 5958210. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00917.
Lin L, Yuan F, Zhang H, Liao N, Luo J, Sun Y PLoS One. 2017; 12(2):e0172088.
PMID: 28207824 PMC: 5312873. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172088.