Smillie E, Mestry N, Clark D, Harrison N, Donnelly N
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024; 9(1):62.
PMID: 39269590
PMC: 11399498.
DOI: 10.1186/s41235-024-00589-z.
Jou J, Calma K, Elizondo L, Cruz J, Moreno S, Chen P
Psychol Res. 2024; 88(5):1471-1482.
PMID: 38801415
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-024-01975-4.
Sommer J, Spencer C, Musolino J, Hemmer P
Behav Res Methods. 2022; 55(1):220-235.
PMID: 35355240
DOI: 10.3758/s13428-022-01826-3.
Ravizza S, Conn K
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021; 29(2):415-429.
PMID: 34131892
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-021-01958-1.
Greve A, Cooper E, Tibon R, Henson R
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018; 148(2):325-341.
PMID: 30394766
PMC: 6390882.
DOI: 10.1037/xge0000498.
Item-specific processing reduces false recognition in older and younger adults: Separating encoding and retrieval using signal detection and the diffusion model.
Huff M, Aschenbrenner A
Mem Cognit. 2018; 46(8):1287-1301.
PMID: 29959616
DOI: 10.3758/s13421-018-0837-1.
Inferential Costs of Trait Centrality in Impression Formation: Organization in Memory and Misremembering.
Nunes L, Garcia-Marques L, Ferreira M, Ramos T
Front Psychol. 2017; 8:1408.
PMID: 28878708
PMC: 5572275.
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01408.
Revisiting von Restorff's early isolation effect.
Schmidt S, Schmidt C
Mem Cognit. 2016; 45(2):194-207.
PMID: 27631791
DOI: 10.3758/s13421-016-0651-6.
Late positive slow waves as markers of chunking during encoding.
Nogueira A, Bueno O, Manzano G, Kohn A, Pompeia S
Front Psychol. 2015; 6:1032.
PMID: 26283984
PMC: 4516824.
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01032.
Does the isolation effect require attention?.
Bireta T, Mazzei C
Mem Cognit. 2015; 44(1):1-14.
PMID: 26193875
DOI: 10.3758/s13421-015-0538-y.
The role of the frontal cortex in memory: an investigation of the Von Restorff effect.
Elhalal A, Davelaar E, Usher M
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014; 8:410.
PMID: 25018721
PMC: 4073090.
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00410.
Effects of distinctive encoding on correct and false memory: a meta-analytic review of costs and benefits and their origins in the DRM paradigm.
Huff M, Bodner G, Fawcett J
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014; 22(2):349-65.
PMID: 24853535
PMC: 4305508.
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-014-0648-8.
Emotional content enhances true but not false memory for categorized stimuli.
Choi H, Kensinger E, Rajaram S
Mem Cognit. 2012; 41(3):403-15.
PMID: 23196385
DOI: 10.3758/s13421-012-0269-2.
Providing support for distinctive processing: the isolation effect in young and older adults.
Smith R
Psychol Aging. 2011; 26(3):744-51.
PMID: 21604888
PMC: 3183572.
DOI: 10.1037/a0022715.
Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) show the isolation effect during serial list recognition memory tests.
Beran M
Anim Cogn. 2011; 14(5):637-45.
PMID: 21487695
PMC: 3193283.
DOI: 10.1007/s10071-011-0398-1.
Binding serial order to representations in working memory: a spatial/verbal dissociation.
Gmeindl L, Walsh M, Courtney S
Mem Cognit. 2011; 39(1):37-46.
PMID: 21264629
PMC: 3034782.
DOI: 10.3758/s13421-010-0012-9.
Distinctiveness in serial memory for spatial information.
Guerard K, Neath I, Surprenant A, Tremblay S
Mem Cognit. 2009; 38(1):83-91.
PMID: 19966241
DOI: 10.3758/MC.38.1.83.
The influence of age on memory for distinctive events.
Geraci L, McDaniel M, Manzano I, Roediger 3rd H
Mem Cognit. 2009; 37(2):175-80.
PMID: 19223567
DOI: 10.3758/MC.37.2.175.
Source-monitoring judgments about anagrams and their solutions: evidence for the role of cognitive operations information in memory.
Foley M, Foley H
Mem Cognit. 2007; 35(2):211-21.
PMID: 17645162
DOI: 10.3758/bf03193442.
Effects of word frequency on individual-item and serial order retention: tests of the order-encoding view.
Merritt P, DeLosh E, McDaniel M
Mem Cognit. 2007; 34(8):1615-27.
PMID: 17489288
DOI: 10.3758/bf03195924.