» Articles » PMID: 11182336

Spouse Ratings of Quality of Life in Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer of Lower Socioeconomic Status: an Assessment of Feasibility, Reliability, and Validity

Overview
Journal Urology
Specialty Urology
Date 2001 Feb 22
PMID 11182336
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To examine the reliability and validity of spousal assessments by evaluating the collateral quality-of-life (QOL) ratings of patients of lower socioeconomic status with metastatic prostate cancer because collateral ratings provide supplemental information when advanced cancer limits patient self-report.

Methods: Patients with Stage D2 prostate cancer (n = 36) of lower socioeconomic status completed validated QOL instruments (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General [FACT-G], European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life-30, and Quality of Life Index). Spouses completed a modified FACT-G, and physicians rated performance status using Karnofsky's scale.

Results: The internal consistency reliability was moderate to high for patient ratings on all FACT-G subscales and for spousal ratings on the modified FACT-G physical, functional, and emotional subscales. The spouses' ratings of the patients on the social and doctor relationship subscales were below the accepted criterion for a measure's use in group comparisons. The comparisons of the mean values of the FACT-G revealed agreement between patients and spouses, except that the spouses rated the patients as having poorer emotional function than did the patients. The intraclass correlations were moderate to high for the functional and emotional subscales and were low, but significant, for the physical and social subscales. The patient and spouse FACT-G ratings correlated with the patient ratings and physician ratings across the instruments for the functional and physical domains (r = 0.48 to 0.77, for patients; r = 0.31 to 0.70, for spouses), with less consistent relationships for the social and emotional domains.

Conclusions: The collateral QOL assessments from spouses are potentially useful in assessing the functional status in patients of lower socioeconomic status with metastatic prostate cancer. For subjective domains, such as the social domain, direct patient assessments are needed.

Citing Articles

Systematic Review of Socio-Emotional Values Within Organizations.

Pascucci T, Cardella G, Hernandez-Sanchez B, Sanchez-Garcia J Front Psychol. 2022; 12:738203.

PMID: 35115980 PMC: 8805683. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.738203.


Expected Versus Experienced Health-Related Quality of Life Among Patients Recovering From Cancer Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Panda N, Solsky I, Neal B, Hawrusik B, Lipsitz S, Lubitz C Ann Surg Open. 2021; 2(2):e060.

PMID: 34179891 PMC: 8221715. DOI: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000060.


Systematic review of caregiver responses for patient health-related quality of life in adult cancer care.

Roydhouse J, Wilson I Qual Life Res. 2017; 26(8):1925-1954.

PMID: 28293821 PMC: 5571651. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-017-1540-6.


Oncology Section EDGE Task Force on Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review of Outcome Measures for Health-Related Quality of Life.

Harrington S, Lee J, Colon G, Alappattu M Rehabil Oncol. 2016; 34(1):27-35.

PMID: 27134804 PMC: 4851243.


Memory and cancer: a review of the literature.

McDougall Jr G, Oliver J, Scogin F Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2014; 28(3):180-6.

PMID: 24856270 PMC: 4033831. DOI: 10.1016/j.apnu.2013.12.005.