» Articles » PMID: 11176006

Communication Between Nurse and Patient During Ventilator Treatment: Patient Reports and RN Evaluations

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialties Critical Care
Nursing
Date 2001 Feb 15
PMID 11176006
Citations 12
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The current treatment preference for patients requiring artificial ventilation is to have them non-sedated whenever feasible. To be aware but unable to communicate is a novel experience for patients and produces problems in nursing. A review of the literature shows that few studies have focused on this significant issue in intensive care nursing.

Aim: To study patient experiences of communication problems during ventilator treatment.

Subjects And Methods: Twenty-two consecutive patients treated in an intensive care unit (ICU) were interviewed three times over a 2-month period about their experiences of changes to their communication during ventilator treatment. Structured questionnaires, including open-ended questions were used on each occasion. The registered nurse (RN) in charge of each patient evaluated the extent of communication during the ventilator treatment in a nurse protocol.

Results: Thirteen of the twenty-two patients reported that the RNs were able to understand their needs and wishes during the ventilator treatment. The RNs, however, reported functional communication in nineteen patients. A functional communication was typically related to the use of effective communication methods, while a lack of communication was associated with compromised medical status of the patients.

Discussion: The results suggest the need for detailed examination of patients' potential for effective communication, evaluation of the communication skills of the RNs, and further investigation of devices that can help facilitate communication between RNs and patients during ventilator treatment.

Citing Articles

Correlation between nurses' attitude and practice toward communication with patients of decreased level of consciousness and its relationship with ethical care in ICU: A cross-sectional study.

Pooyanfard F, Razban F, Asadi N, Haji-Maghsoudi S Health Sci Rep. 2023; 6(8):e1484.

PMID: 37636286 PMC: 10450122. DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.1484.


Communication with mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care units: A concept analysis.

Wallander Karlsen M, Holm A, Kvande M, Dreyer P, Tate J, Heyn L J Adv Nurs. 2022; 79(2):563-580.

PMID: 36443915 PMC: 10099624. DOI: 10.1111/jan.15501.


The effect of the family presence on anxiety and agitation of patients under mechanical ventilation after open heart surgery: a randomized clinical trial.

Mokhtari Nouri J, Safaeipour L, Vafadar Z, Moradian S Perioper Med (Lond). 2021; 10(1):40.

PMID: 34719406 PMC: 8557965. DOI: 10.1186/s13741-021-00207-2.


A pilot study assessing the spiritual, emotional, physical/environmental, and physiological needs of mechanically ventilated surgical intensive care unit patients via eye tracking devices, head nodding, and communication boards.

Duffy E, Garry J, Talbot L, Pasternak D, Flinn A, Minardi C Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2018; 3(1):e000180.

PMID: 30246152 PMC: 6144907. DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2018-000180.


Satisfaction Domains Differ between the Patient and Their Family in Adult Intensive Care Units.

Mukhopadhyay A, Song G, Sim P, Ting K, Yoo J, Wang Q Biomed Res Int. 2017; 2016:9025643.

PMID: 28044138 PMC: 5156795. DOI: 10.1155/2016/9025643.