» Articles » PMID: 11152827

Intravascular Ultrasound Criteria for the Assessment of the Functional Significance of Intermediate Coronary Artery Stenoses and Comparison with Fractional Flow Reserve

Overview
Journal Am J Cardiol
Date 2001 Jan 12
PMID 11152827
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The functional significance of coronary artery stenoses of intermediate severity is important in determining strategy in patient care. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is often used to evaluate coronary stenosis severity. However, at present, few data are available about the role IVUS in the assessment of functional significance of intermediate lesions. Myocardial fractional flow reserve (FFR) <0.75 is a reliable index of a functionally severe coronary stenosis. In 53 lesions we assessed (1) by pressure wire: FFR (index of functional significance), and (2) by IVUS: minimal lumen cross-sectional area (MLA, square millimeters), minimal lumen diameter (MLD, millimeters), lesion length (millimeters), and percent area stenosis at the lesion site. By regression analysis, percent area stenosis and lesion length had a significant inverse correlation with FFR (r = -0.58, p <0.001, r = -0.41, p <0.004, respectively). MLD and MLA showed a significant positive relation with FFR (r = 0.51, p <0.001, r = 0.41, p <0.004, respectively). By using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, we identified a percent area stenosis > 70% (sensitivity 100%, specificity 68%), a MLD < or = 1.8 mm (sensitivity 100%, specificity 66%), a MLA < or =4.0 mm2 (sensitivity 92%, specificity 56%), and a lesion length of >10 mm (sensitivity 41%, specificity 80%) to be the best cut-off values to fit with a FFR <0.75. The combined evaluation of both percent area stenosis and MLD made the IVUS examination more specific (sensitivity 100%, specificity 76%). In 53 intermediate coronary lesions found by angiography, IVUS area stenosis >70%, MLD < or =1.8 mm, MLA < or =4.0 mm2, and lesion length > 10 mm reliably identified functionally critical intermediate coronary stenoses.

Citing Articles

Discordance Between Angiographic Assessment and Fractional Flow Reserve or Intravascular Ultrasound in Intermediate Coronary Lesions: A Post-hoc Analysis of the FLAVOUR Trial.

Lee J, Ahn S, Jeon H, Lee J, Youn Y, Zhang J Korean Circ J. 2024; 54(8):485-496.

PMID: 38956940 PMC: 11306421. DOI: 10.4070/kcj.2024.0046.


Role of intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography in intracoronary imaging for coronary artery disease: a systematic review.

Sarwar M, Adedokun S, Anantha Narayanan M J Geriatr Cardiol. 2024; 21(1):104-129.

PMID: 38440344 PMC: 10908578. DOI: 10.26599/1671-5411.2024.01.001.


Intravascular Imaging versus Physiological Assessment versus Biomechanics-Which Is a Better Guide for Coronary Revascularization.

Starczynski M, Dudek S, Barus P, Niedzieska E, Wawrzenczyk M, Ochijewicz D Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(12).

PMID: 37371012 PMC: 10297310. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13122117.


The Continuum of Invasive Techniques for the Assessment of Intermediate Coronary Lesions.

Popa-Fotea N, Scafa-Udriste A, Dorobantu M Diagnostics (Basel). 2022; 12(6).

PMID: 35741302 PMC: 9221746. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12061492.


The assessment of intermediate coronary lesions using intracoronary imaging.

Nogic J, Prosser H, OBrien J, Thakur U, Soon K, Proimos G Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2020; 10(5):1445-1460.

PMID: 33224767 PMC: 7666953. DOI: 10.21037/cdt-20-226.