» Articles » PMID: 11138687

Different Approaches to Bone Densitometry

Overview
Journal J Nucl Med
Specialty Nuclear Medicine
Date 2001 Jan 4
PMID 11138687
Citations 38
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

From 1990 to 2000, several effective new treatments were introduced for the prevention of osteoporotic fractures; these treatments were proven effective in large, international, clinical trials. At the same time, there was rapid technologic innovation, with the introduction of new radiologic methods for the noninvasive assessment of patients' bone density status. These developments led to the publication of guidelines for the clinical use of bone densitometry that include criteria for the referral of patients for investigation as well as recommendations for intervention thresholds for the initiation of preventive treatment of osteoporosis. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scanning of the spine and hip remains the technique of choice for bone densitometry studies, although there is now a wider appreciation of the need for smaller, cheaper devices for scanning the peripheral skeleton if the millions of women most at risk of a fragility fracture are to be identified and treated. This article reviews these developments, concentrating in particular on the advantages and disadvantages of the different types of equipment available for performing bone densitometry investigations, the guidelines for the referral of patients, and the principles for the interpretation of the scan findings.

Citing Articles

Impacts of osteosarcopenia on musculoskeletal health, risks of falls and fractures, and activities of daily living among population aged 50 and above: an age- and sex-matched cross-sectional analysis.

Nguyen B, Lin A, Yang W, Cheng S, Kuo Y, Nguyen T Aging Clin Exp Res. 2024; 37(1):8.

PMID: 39725822 PMC: 11671419. DOI: 10.1007/s40520-024-02902-8.


Responders and non-responders to romosozumab treatment.

Tominaga A, Wada K, Kato Y, Okazaki K J Bone Miner Metab. 2024; .

PMID: 39645533 DOI: 10.1007/s00774-024-01570-y.


Comparison of whole body bone mineral density measurements between dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and novel bioelectrical impedance analysis.

Chuang C, Lai C, Huang A, Su P, Chu L, Hsieh K Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):29127.

PMID: 39582046 PMC: 11586393. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-80721-7.


An explainable machine learning estimated biological age based on morphological parameters of the spine.

Xu Z, Peng Y, Zhang M, Wang R, Yang Z Geroscience. 2024; .

PMID: 39446225 DOI: 10.1007/s11357-024-01394-8.


Prenatal and Neonatal Bone Health: Updated Review on Early Identification of Newborns at High Risk for Osteopenia.

Perrone S, Caporilli C, Grassi F, Ferrocino M, Biagi E, DellOrto V Nutrients. 2023; 15(16).

PMID: 37630705 PMC: 10459154. DOI: 10.3390/nu15163515.