» Articles » PMID: 11128901

The Tools of Disability Outcomes Research Functional Status Measures

Overview
Date 2000 Dec 29
PMID 11128901
Citations 63
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To review the major functional status measures currently used in rehabilitation research, including the domains and scope of functional status measures, as well as the psychometric properties of selected functional status measures and their use in adult rehabilitation populations.

Data Sources: Measures of physical functioning widely used in rehabilitation research.

Study Selection: Major generic measures included the following activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living: the FIM instrument, the Katz Activities of Daily Living Scale, the Level of Rehabilitation Scale, the Barthel index, and the Patient Evaluation and Conference System. Measures were evaluated based on published evidence of validity, reliability, and sensitivity.

Data Extraction: Measures were chosen on the basis of the amount and quality of published research on the functional measures widely used in rehabilitation medicine. Independent research of computer databases and reviews of functional measures were conducted to determine suitability for inclusion. The quality and validity of the measures were assessed using standard psychometric guidelines.

Data Synthesis: Measures were evaluated based on published evidence of validity, reliability, sensitivity response and administrative burdens and instrument bias. Each criterion was graded on a 3-point scale reflecting the level of evidence.

Conclusion: Researchers in the field of disabilities research need to consider carefully study objectives when measuring physical functioning in people with disabilities.

Citing Articles

Two-year trajectory of functional recovery and quality of life in post-intensive care syndrome: a multicenter prospective observational study on mechanically ventilated patients with coronavirus disease-19.

Hatakeyama J, Nakamura K, Inoue S, Liu K, Yamakawa K, Nishida T J Intensive Care. 2025; 13(1):7.

PMID: 39915821 PMC: 11800417. DOI: 10.1186/s40560-025-00777-z.


Relationship between functional independence measure scores and timed up-and-go time in postoperative elderly patients with vertebral and hip fractures.

Ashida D, Nishio H, Fujiwara M, Iwai N J Phys Ther Sci. 2024; 36(12):765-771.

PMID: 39624351 PMC: 11608656. DOI: 10.1589/jpts.36.765.


Reliability and validity of the Greek adaptation of the Modified Barthel Index in neurorehabilitation patients.

Ferfeli S, Galanos A, Dontas I, Triantafyllou A, Triantafyllopoulos I, Chronopoulos E Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2023; 60(1):44-54.

PMID: 37877957 PMC: 10938040. DOI: 10.23736/S1973-9087.23.08056-5.


The upper extremity postthrombotic syndrome score: an international Delphi consensus study to determine the score's functional disability component.

Schropp L, Cats R, de Kleijn R, van Hattum E, Middeldorp S, Nijkeuter M Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2023; 7(1):100051.

PMID: 36873563 PMC: 9982296. DOI: 10.1016/j.rpth.2023.100051.


The prognostic value of the Barthel Index for mortality in patients with COVID-19: A cross-sectional study.

Wang E, Liu A, Wang Z, Shang X, Zhang L, Jin Y Front Public Health. 2023; 10:978237.

PMID: 36761326 PMC: 9902915. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.978237.