» Articles » PMID: 11113203

Stimulation of Homologous Recombination Through Targeted Cleavage by Chimeric Nucleases

Overview
Journal Mol Cell Biol
Specialty Cell Biology
Date 2000 Dec 13
PMID 11113203
Citations 256
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Chimeric nucleases that are hybrids between a nonspecific DNA cleavage domain and a zinc finger DNA recognition domain were tested for their ability to find and cleave their target sites in living cells. Both engineered DNA substrates and the nucleases were injected into Xenopus laevis oocyte nuclei, in which DNA cleavage and subsequent homologous recombination were observed. Specific cleavage required two inverted copies of the zinc finger recognition site in close proximity, reflecting the need for dimerization of the cleavage domain. Cleaved DNA molecules were activated for homologous recombination; in optimum conditions, essentially 100% of the substrate recombined, even though the DNA was assembled into chromatin. The original nuclease has an 18-amino-acid linker between the zinc finger and cleavage domains, and this enzyme cleaved in oocytes at paired sites separated by spacers in the range of 6 to 18 bp, with a rather sharp optimum at 8 bp. By shortening the linker, we found that the range of effective site separations could be narrowed significantly. With no intentional linker between the binding and cleavage domains, only binding sites exactly 6 bp apart supported efficient cleavage in oocytes. We also showed that two chimeric enzymes with different binding specificities could collaborate to stimulate recombination when their individual sites were appropriately placed. Because the recognition specificity of zinc fingers can be altered experimentally, this approach holds great promise for inducing targeted recombination in a variety of organisms.

Citing Articles

Dissecting SNARE-Mediated Exocytosis in RBL-2H3 Mast Cells.

Adhikari P, Xu H Methods Mol Biol. 2025; 2887():149-166.

PMID: 39806152 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-4314-3_10.


Engineered PsCas9 enables therapeutic genome editing in mouse liver with lipid nanoparticles.

Degtev D, Bravo J, Emmanouilidi A, Zdravkovic A, Choong O, Touza J Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):9173.

PMID: 39511150 PMC: 11544209. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-53418-8.


Genome editing in Sub-Saharan Africa: a game-changing strategy for climate change mitigation and sustainable agriculture.

Amoah P, Oumarou Mahamane A, Byiringiro M, Mahula N, Manneh N, Oluwasegun Y GM Crops Food. 2024; 15(1):279-302.

PMID: 39481911 PMC: 11533803. DOI: 10.1080/21645698.2024.2411767.


Genetically humanized phenylketonuria mouse model as a testing tool for human genome editing in fertilized eggs.

Tsuji-Hosokawa A, Tsuchiya I, Shimizu K, Terao M, Yasuhara M, Miyamoto N J Inherit Metab Dis. 2024; 48(1):e12803.

PMID: 39380247 PMC: 11729594. DOI: 10.1002/jimd.12803.


Identification and Validation of New DNA-PKcs Inhibitors through High-Throughput Virtual Screening and Experimental Verification.

Dai L, Yu P, Fan H, Xia W, Zhao Y, Zhang P Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(14).

PMID: 39063224 PMC: 11277333. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25147982.


References
1.
Thomas K, Folger K, Capecchi M . High frequency targeting of genes to specific sites in the mammalian genome. Cell. 1986; 44(3):419-28. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90463-0. View

2.
Smith J, Berg J, Chandrasegaran S . A detailed study of the substrate specificity of a chimeric restriction enzyme. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998; 27(2):674-81. PMC: 148231. DOI: 10.1093/nar/27.2.674. View

3.
Rudin N, Haber J . Efficient repair of HO-induced chromosomal breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by recombination between flanking homologous sequences. Mol Cell Biol. 1988; 8(9):3918-28. PMC: 365451. DOI: 10.1128/mcb.8.9.3918-3928.1988. View

4.
Capecchi M . Altering the genome by homologous recombination. Science. 1989; 244(4910):1288-92. DOI: 10.1126/science.2660260. View

5.
Maryon E, Carroll D . Degradation of linear DNA by a strand-specific exonuclease activity in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Mol Cell Biol. 1989; 9(11):4862-71. PMC: 363636. DOI: 10.1128/mcb.9.11.4862-4871.1989. View