» Articles » PMID: 11113202

DNA Damage-dependent Nuclear Dynamics of the Mre11 Complex

Overview
Journal Mol Cell Biol
Specialty Cell Biology
Date 2000 Dec 13
PMID 11113202
Citations 157
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The Mre11 complex has been implicated in diverse aspects of the cellular response to DNA damage. We used in situ fractionation of human fibroblasts to carry out cytologic analysis of Mre11 complex proteins in the double-strand break (DSB) response. In situ fractionation removes most nucleoplasmic protein, permitting immunofluorescent localization of proteins that become more avidly bound to nuclear structures after induction of DNA damage. We found that a fraction of the Mre11 complex was bound to promyelocyte leukemia protein bodies in undamaged cells. Within 10 min after gamma irradiation, nuclear retention of the Mre11 complex in small granular foci was observed and persisted until 2 h postirradiation. In light of the previous demonstration that the Mre11 complex associated with ionizing radiation (IR)-induced DSBs, we infer that the protein retained under these conditions was associated with DNA damage. We also observed increased retention of Rad51 following IR treatment, although IR induced Rad51 foci were distinct from Mre11 foci. The ATM kinase, which phosphorylates Nbs1 during activation of the S-phase checkpoint, was not required for the Mre11 complex to associate with DNA damage. These data suggest that the functions of the Mre11 complex in the DSB response are implicitly dependent upon its ability to detect DNA damage.

Citing Articles

DNA Double Strand Break and Response Fluorescent Assays: Choices and Interpretation.

Atkinson J, Bezak E, Le H, Kempson I Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(4).

PMID: 38396904 PMC: 10889524. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25042227.


The interactions between PML nuclear bodies and small and medium size DNA viruses.

Ryabchenko B, Sroller V, Hornikova L, Lovtsov A, Forstova J, Huerfano S Virol J. 2023; 20(1):82.

PMID: 37127643 PMC: 10152602. DOI: 10.1186/s12985-023-02049-4.


X-rays-Induced Bystander Effect Consists in the Formation of DNA Breaks in a Calcium-Dependent Manner: Influence of the Experimental Procedure and the Individual Factor.

Restier-Verlet J, Joubert A, Ferlazzo M, Granzotto A, Sonzogni L, Al-Choboq J Biomolecules. 2023; 13(3).

PMID: 36979480 PMC: 10046354. DOI: 10.3390/biom13030542.


Filamentous nuclear actin regulation of PML NBs during the DNA damage response is deregulated by prelamin A.

Cobb A, De Silva S, Hayward R, Sek K, Ulferts S, Grosse R Cell Death Dis. 2022; 13(12):1042.

PMID: 36522328 PMC: 9755150. DOI: 10.1038/s41419-022-05491-4.


Analysis of MRE11 and Mortality Among Adults With Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Managed With Trimodality Therapy.

Magliocco A, Moughan J, Miyamoto D, Simko J, Shipley W, Gray P JAMA Netw Open. 2022; 5(11):e2242378.

PMID: 36383379 PMC: 9669810. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.42378.


References
1.
Nelms B, Maser R, Mackay J, Lagally M, Petrini J . In situ visualization of DNA double-strand break repair in human fibroblasts. Science. 1998; 280(5363):590-2. DOI: 10.1126/science.280.5363.590. View

2.
Badie C, Iliakis G, Foray N, Alsbeih G, Cedervall B, Chavaudra N . Induction and rejoining of DNA double-strand breaks and interphase chromosome breaks after exposure to X rays in one normal and two hypersensitive human fibroblast cell lines. Radiat Res. 1995; 144(1):26-35. View

3.
Carney J, Maser R, Olivares H, Davis E, LE BEAU M, Yates 3rd J . The hMre11/hRad50 protein complex and Nijmegen breakage syndrome: linkage of double-strand break repair to the cellular DNA damage response. Cell. 1998; 93(3):477-86. DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81175-7. View

4.
Nugent C, Bosco G, ROSS L, Evans S, Salinger A, Moore J . Telomere maintenance is dependent on activities required for end repair of double-strand breaks. Curr Biol. 1998; 8(11):657-60. DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9822(98)70253-2. View

5.
Kanaar R, Hoeijmakers J . Recombination and joining: different means to the same ends. Genes Funct. 1997; 1(3):165-74. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-4624.1997.00016.x. View