Influence of Bubble Size Distribution on the Echogenicity of Ultrasound Contrast Agents: a Study of SonoVue
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Rationale And Objectives: To study the relative contributions of different bubble size classes to SonoVue's echogenicity in fundamental acoustic imaging modes. SonoVue is a contrast agent, previously known as BR1, with a bubble size distribution extending from approximately 0.7 to 10 microm.
Methods: A model for the acoustic response of SonoVue was determined and validated for a set of experimental data. This model was used to simulate the acoustic response of a standard batch of SonoVue as the sum of responses of non-overlapping bubble size classes.
Results: The simulation was first validated for a standard SonoVue bubble size distribution. When this distribution was considered as five size classes with equal numbers of bubbles, it was found that bubbles smaller than 2 microm accounted for 60% of the total number but contained only 5% of the total gas volume. The simulation results indicated marked differences in the acoustic contributions from these classes, with 80% of the acoustic efficacy provided by bubbles 3 to 9 microm in diameter. The study also compared bubble distributions in number, surface, and volume, with the distribution computed in terms of acoustic efficacy.
Conclusions: This study shows why bubble volume is a much better indicator of SonoVue's efficacy than is bubble count. A low threshold in diameter was found for SonoVue microbubbles at approximately 2 microm, under which size bubbles do not contribute appreciably to the echogenicity at medical ultrasound frequencies.
Block J, Li H, Collado-Lara G, Kooiman K, Rix A, Chen J ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2025; 8(2):1240-1250.
PMID: 39900350 PMC: 11836932. DOI: 10.1021/acsabm.4c01551.
Methods for Rapid Characterization of Tunable Microbubble Formulations.
Harpster S, Pineiro A, Wong J Bioengineering (Basel). 2025; 11(12.
PMID: 39768042 PMC: 11673760. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11121224.
Li D, Zhang R, Lan H, Chen M, Huang Z, Zhao H Insights Imaging. 2024; 15(1):65.
PMID: 38411872 PMC: 10899544. DOI: 10.1186/s13244-024-01632-9.
Nanomedicines for Improved Management of Ectopic Pregnancy: A Narrative Review.
Moses A, Korzun T, Mamnoon B, Baldwin M, Myatt L, Taratula O Small. 2023; 20(41):e2301873.
PMID: 37471169 PMC: 10837845. DOI: 10.1002/smll.202301873.
Backscattering amplitude in ultrasound localization microscopy.
Renaudin N, Pezet S, Ialy-Radio N, Demene C, Tanter M Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):11477.
PMID: 37455266 PMC: 10350458. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-38531-w.