» Articles » PMID: 11102502

Learning of Visuomotor Transformations for Vectorial Planning of Reaching Trajectories

Overview
Journal J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2000 Jan 11
PMID 11102502
Citations 413
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The planning of visually guided reaches is accomplished by independent specification of extent and direction. We investigated whether this separation of extent and direction planning for well practiced movements could be explained by differences in the adaptation to extent and directional errors during motor learning. We compared the time course and generalization of adaptation with two types of screen cursor transformation that altered the relationship between hand space and screen space. The first was a gain change that induced extent errors and required subjects to learn a new scaling factor. The second was a screen cursor rotation that induced directional errors and required subjects to learn new reference axes. Subjects learned a new scaling factor at the same rate when training with one or multiple target distances, whereas learning new reference axes took longer and was less complete when training with multiple compared with one target direction. After training to a single target, subjects were able to transfer learning of a new scaling factor to previously unvisited distances and directions. In contrast, generalization of rotation adaptation was incomplete; there was transfer across distances and arm configurations but not across directions. Learning a rotated reference frame only occurred after multiple target directions were sampled during training. These results suggest the separate processing of extent and directional errors by the brain and support the idea that reaching movements are planned as a hand-centered vector whose extent and direction are established via learning a scaling factor and reference axes.

Citing Articles

A neural implementation model of feedback-based motor learning.

Feulner B, Perich M, Miller L, Clopath C, Gallego J Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):1805.

PMID: 39979257 PMC: 11842561. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-54738-5.


Dynamical constraints on neural population activity.

Oby E, Degenhart A, Grigsby E, Motiwala A, McClain N, Marino P Nat Neurosci. 2025; 28(2):383-393.

PMID: 39825141 PMC: 11802451. DOI: 10.1038/s41593-024-01845-7.


Implicit motor adaptation patterns in a redundant motor task manipulating a stick with both hands.

Kobayashi T, Nozaki D Elife. 2024; 13.

PMID: 39602322 PMC: 11602188. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.96665.


Effects of online and offline trigeminal nerve stimulation on visuomotor learning.

Arias D, Buneo C Front Hum Neurosci. 2024; 18:1436365.

PMID: 39483193 PMC: 11526447. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1436365.


The cerebellum acts as the analog to the medial temporal lobe for sensorimotor memory.

Hadjiosif A, Gibo T, Smith M Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(42):e2411459121.

PMID: 39374383 PMC: 11494333. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2411459121.


References
1.
Gordon J, Ghilardi M, Ghez C . Accuracy of planar reaching movements. I. Independence of direction and extent variability. Exp Brain Res. 1994; 99(1):97-111. DOI: 10.1007/BF00241415. View

2.
Goodbody S, Wolpert D . Temporal and amplitude generalization in motor learning. J Neurophysiol. 1998; 79(4):1825-38. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1998.79.4.1825. View

3.
Georgopoulos A, Kalaska J, Caminiti R, Massey J . On the relations between the direction of two-dimensional arm movements and cell discharge in primate motor cortex. J Neurosci. 1982; 2(11):1527-37. PMC: 6564361. View

4.
Pine Z, Krakauer J, Gordon J, Ghez C . Learning of scaling factors and reference axes for reaching movements. Neuroreport. 1996; 7(14):2357-61. DOI: 10.1097/00001756-199610020-00016. View

5.
Vindras P, Desmurget M, Prablanc C, Viviani P . Pointing errors reflect biases in the perception of the initial hand position. J Neurophysiol. 1998; 79(6):3290-4. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1998.79.6.3290. View