» Articles » PMID: 11090184

Persistent Rat Virus Infection in Smooth Muscle of Euthymic and Athymic Rats

Overview
Journal J Virol
Date 2000 Nov 23
PMID 11090184
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Rat virus (RV) infection can cause disease or disrupt responses that rely on cell proliferation. Therefore, persistent infection has the potential to amplify RV interference with research. As a step toward determining underlying mechanisms of persistence, we compared acute and persistent RV infections in infant euthymic and athymic rats inoculated oronasally with the University of Massachusetts strain of RV. Rats were assessed by virus isolation, in situ hybridization, and serology. Selected tissues also were analyzed by Southern blotting or immunohistochemistry. Virus was widely disseminated during acute infection in rats of both phenotypes, whereas vascular smooth muscle cells (SMC) were the primary targets during persistent infection. The prevalence of virus-positive cells remained moderate to high in athymic rats through 8 weeks but decreased in euthymic rats by 2 weeks, coincident with seroconversion and perivascular infiltration of mononuclear cells. Virus-positive pneumocytes and renal tubular epithelial cells also were detected through 8 weeks, implying that kidney and lung excrete virus during persistent infection. Viral mRNA was detected in SMC of both phenotypes through 8 weeks, indicating that persistent infection includes virus replication. However, only half of the SMC containing viral mRNA at 4 weeks stained for proliferating cell nuclear antigen, a protein expressed in cycling cells. The results demonstrate that vasculotropism is a significant feature of persistent infection, that virus replication continues during persistent infection, and that host immunity reduces, but does not eliminate, infection.

Citing Articles

A comparison of mouse parvovirus 1 infection in BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice: susceptibility, replication, shedding, and seroconversion.

Henderson K, Pritchett-Corning K, Perkins C, Banu L, Jennings S, Francis B Comp Med. 2015; 65(1):5-14.

PMID: 25730752 PMC: 4396924.


Minute virus of mice: antibody response, viral shedding, and persistence of viral DNA in multiple strains of mice.

Janus L, Mahler M, Kohl W, Smoczek A, Hedrich H, Bleich A Comp Med. 2008; 58(4):360-8.

PMID: 18724778 PMC: 2706042.


Comparative analysis reveals frequent recombination in the parvoviruses.

Shackelton L, Hoelzer K, Parrish C, Holmes E J Gen Virol. 2007; 88(Pt 12):3294-3301.

PMID: 18024898 PMC: 3326350. DOI: 10.1099/vir.0.83255-0.


Immune responses to the major capsid protein during parvovirus infection of rats.

Ball-Goodrich L, Paturzo F, Johnson E, Steger K, Jacoby R J Virol. 2002; 76(19):10044-9.

PMID: 12208983 PMC: 136518. DOI: 10.1128/jvi.76.19.10044-10049.2002.

References
1.
Baringer J, NATHANSON N . Parvovirus hemorrhagic encephalopathy of rats. Electron microscopic observations of the vascular lesions. Lab Invest. 1972; 27(5):514-22. View

2.
van Elsacker-Niele A, Kroes A . Human parvovirus B19: relevance in internal medicine. Neth J Med. 1999; 54(6):221-30. DOI: 10.1016/s0300-2977(99)00011-x. View

3.
Campbell Jr D, Staal S, Manders E, Bonnard G, Oldham R, SALZMAN L . Inhibition of in vitro lymphoproliferative responses by in vivo passaged rat 13762 mammary adenocarcinoma cells. II. Evidenceth Kilham rat virus is responsible for the inhibitory effect. Cell Immunol. 1977; 33(2):378-91. DOI: 10.1016/0008-8749(77)90166-6. View

4.
Robey R, Woodman D, Hetrick F . Studies on the natural infection of rats with the Kilham rat virus. Am J Epidemiol. 1968; 88(1):139-43. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a120863. View

5.
Vujanovic N, Herberman R, Hiserodt J . Lymphokine-activated killer cells in rats: analysis of tissue and strain distribution, ontogeny, and target specificity. Cancer Res. 1988; 48(4):878-83. View