» Articles » PMID: 11082853

Selective Influence of Second Target Exposure Duration and Task-1 Load Effects in the Attentional Blink Phenomenon

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2000 Nov 18
PMID 11082853
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of the experiments was to constrain the locus of interference in the attentional blink (AB) paradigm. Two visual stimuli, T1 and T2, were shown 300 msec apart, and each was followed by a mask. T1 was an "H," an "S," an "&," or a blank field; T2 consisted of five letters. In Task1, blank fields and & characters could be ignored, whereas Hs and Ss had to be identified and reported. Task2 was always to report as many letters as possible from T2. Task2 performance was lower when T1 had to be reported, as expected from the attentional blink phenomenon (AB). The exposure duration of T2 was also manipulated. More letters could be reported as exposure duration was increased. However, this effect was additive with manipulations of Task1 processing load that produced the AB effect. Log-linear analyses assuming that effects of T2 exposure duration and Task1 load effects occur at functionally distinct stages of processing provided satisfactory fits to the results, suggesting that none of the AB effect occurs as early as those of T2 exposure duration. The results suggest that the locus of the AB effect is later than the stage(s) of processing affected by exposure duration.

Citing Articles

Rhythm and Attention: Does the Beat Position of a Visual or Auditory Regular Pulse Modulate T2 Detection in the Attentional Blink?.

Bermeitinger C, Frings C Front Psychol. 2015; 6:1847.

PMID: 26648899 PMC: 4664834. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01847.


Blinded by the load: attention, awareness and the role of perceptual load.

Lavie N, Beck D, Konstantinou N Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014; 369(1641):20130205.

PMID: 24639578 PMC: 3965161. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0205.


Measuring and modeling attentional dwell time.

Petersen A, Kyllingsbaek S, Bundesen C Psychon Bull Rev. 2012; 19(6):1029-46.

PMID: 22847596 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-012-0286-y.


Direct evidence for a role of working memory in the attentional blink.

Akyurek E, Hommel B, Jolicoeur P Mem Cognit. 2007; 35(4):621-7.

PMID: 17848020 DOI: 10.3758/bf03193300.


Early cortical facilitation for emotionally arousing targets during the attentional blink.

Keil A, Ihssen N, Heim S BMC Biol. 2006; 4:23.

PMID: 16857054 PMC: 1559646. DOI: 10.1186/1741-7007-4-23.


References
1.
Kleiss J, Lane D . Locus and persistence of capacity limitations in visual information processing. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1986; 12(2):200-10. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.12.2.200. View

2.
Ward , Duncan , Shapiro . The Slow Time-Course of Visual Attention. Cogn Psychol. 1996; 30(1):79-109. DOI: 10.1006/cogp.1996.0003. View

3.
Chun M, Potter M . A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1995; 21(1):109-27. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.21.1.109. View

4.
Montant M, Nazir T, Poncet M . PURE ALEXIA AND THE VIEWING POSITION EFFECT IN PRINTED WORDS. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2017; 15(1-2):93-140. DOI: 10.1080/026432998381230. View

5.
Nazir T, Jacobs A, ORegan J . Letter legibility and visual word recognition. Mem Cognit. 1998; 26(4):810-21. DOI: 10.3758/bf03211400. View