» Articles » PMID: 11082850

Modeling the Effects of Irrelevant Speech on Memory

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2000 Nov 18
PMID 11082850
Citations 57
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The feature model (Nairne, 1990) is extended to account for the effects of irrelevant speech and concomitant interactions in immediate serial recall. In the feature model, both articulatory suppression and irrelevant speech are seen as adding noise to the memory representation, the difference being that articulatory suppression diverts more resources than does irrelevant speech. The addition of noise impairs recall because it reduces the probability of successful redintegration. When a competitor is incorrectly recalled, rather than the correct item, this competitor is recalled out of order, producing an increase in order errors. Six simulations are reported that show that the model accounts for (1) the impairment by both irrelevant speech and articulatory suppression, (2) the irrelevance of the phonological and semantic composition of the irrelevant speech, (3) greater disruption when the irrelevant speech tokens vary, (4) the abolition of the phonological similarity effect for visual, but not for auditory, items, (5) the abolition of the word length effect for both visual and auditory items, and (6) the abolition of the irrelevant speech effect under articulatory suppression for both visual and auditory items. The feature model is compared with the two other major views of irrelevant speech, the phonological store hypothesis and the changing state hypothesis.

Citing Articles

Investigating a Metrical Hebb Effect for lists of words.

Paice A, Johnson A, Legg R, Smalle E, Page M Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024; 78(2):284-309.

PMID: 39268671 PMC: 11783982. DOI: 10.1177/17470218241285884.


The Working Memory Model and the relationship between immediate serial recall and immediate free recall.

Ward G, Beaman P Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024; 78(2):310-336.

PMID: 39223965 PMC: 11783987. DOI: 10.1177/17470218241282093.


Multifaceted consequences of visual distraction during natural behaviour.

Kumle L, Vo M, Nobre A, Draschkow D Commun Psychol. 2024; 2(1):49.

PMID: 38812582 PMC: 11129948. DOI: 10.1038/s44271-024-00099-0.


The phonological store of working memory: A critique and an alternative, perceptual-motor, approach to verbal short-term memory.

Hughes R Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024; 78(2):240-263.

PMID: 38785305 PMC: 11783984. DOI: 10.1177/17470218241257885.


The orthographic/phonological neighbourhood size effect and set size.

Guitard D, Miller L, Neath I, Roodenrys S Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023; 77(2):298-307.

PMID: 36924342 PMC: 10798011. DOI: 10.1177/17470218231165863.


References
1.
Beaman C, Jones D . Irrelevant sound disrupts order information in free recall as in serial recall. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1998; 51(3):615-36. DOI: 10.1080/713755774. View

2.
Lecompte D . An irrelevant speech effect with repeated and continuous background speech. Psychon Bull Rev. 2013; 2(3):391-7. DOI: 10.3758/BF03210978. View

3.
Jones D, Macken W . Organizational factors in the effect of irrelevant speech: the role of spatial location and timing. Mem Cognit. 1995; 23(2):192-200. DOI: 10.3758/bf03197221. View

4.
Lecompte D . In search of a strong visual recency effect. Mem Cognit. 1992; 20(5):563-72. DOI: 10.3758/bf03199588. View

5.
Ellermeier W, Hellbruck J . Is level irrelevant in "irrelevant speech"? Effects of loudness, signal-to-noise ratio, and binaural unmasking. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1999; 24(5):1406-14. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.24.5.1406. View