» Articles » PMID: 11074247

Phonotactic Cues for Segmentation of Fluent Speech by Infants

Overview
Journal Cognition
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Psychology
Date 2000 Nov 14
PMID 11074247
Citations 60
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There is growing evidence that infants become sensitive to the probabilistic phonotactics of their ambient language sometime during the second half of their first year. The present study investigates whether 9-month-olds make use of phonotactic cues to segment words from fluent speech. Using the Headturn Preference Procedure, we found that infants listened to a CVC stimulus longer when the stimulus previously appeared in a sentential context with good phonotactic cues than when it appeared in one without such cues. The goodness of the phonotactic cues was estimated from the frequency with which the C.C clusters at the onset and offset of a CVC test stimulus (i.e. C.CVC.C) are found within and between words in child-directed speech, with high between-word probability associated with good cues to word boundaries. A similar segmentation result emerged when good phonotactic cues occurred only at the onset (i.e. C.CVC.C) or the offset (i.e. C.CVC.C) of the target words in the utterances. Together, the results suggest that 9-month-olds use probabilistic phonotactics to segment speech into words and that high-probability between-word clusters are interpreted as both word onsets and word offsets.

Citing Articles

Use of Statistical and Acoustic Cues for Speech Segmentation in French-Learning 7-Month-Old Infants and French-Speaking Adults.

Marimon M, Berdasco-Munoz E, Hohle B, Nazzi T Open Mind (Camb). 2025; 9:189-209.

PMID: 39906869 PMC: 11793197. DOI: 10.1162/opmi_a_00184.


Linguistic modulation of the neural encoding of phonemes.

Kim S, De Martino F, Overath T Cereb Cortex. 2024; 34(4.

PMID: 38687241 PMC: 11059272. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhae155.


Infants' sensitivity to phonotactic regularities related to perceptually low-salient fricatives: a cross-linguistic study.

Piot L, Nazzi T, Boll-Avetisyan N Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1367240.

PMID: 38533216 PMC: 10964922. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1367240.


Language structure, attitudes, and learning from ambient exposure: Lexical and phonotactic knowledge of Spanish among non-Spanish-speaking Californians and Texans.

Todd S, Ben Youssef C, Vasquez-Aguilar A PLoS One. 2023; 18(4):e0284919.

PMID: 37104290 PMC: 10138781. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284919.


Consequences of phonological variation for algorithmic word segmentation.

Beech C, Swingley D Cognition. 2023; 235:105401.

PMID: 36787685 PMC: 10085835. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105401.