» Articles » PMID: 11044315

Modifications to the Cavopulmonary Anastomosis Do Not Eliminate Early Sinus Node Dysfunction

Overview
Date 2000 Oct 24
PMID 11044315
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To determine whether operations that theoretically jeopardize the sinus node (hemi-Fontan and/or lateral tunnel Fontan procedures) are associated with a greater risk of sinus node dysfunction than those that theoretically spare the sinus node (bidirectional Glenn and/or extracardiac conduit).

Methods: Between January 1, 1996, and December 31, 1999, a prospective cohort study was conducted evaluating the incidence of sinus node dysfunction in patients undergoing a bidirectional Glenn or hemi-Fontan procedure and those in whom the Fontan repair was completed with either an extracardiac conduit or a lateral tunnel. Sinus node dysfunction was defined (1) as a heart rate more than 2 SD below age-adjusted norms or (2) as a predominant junctional rhythm and/or a sinus pause of more than 3 seconds as determined by the resting electrocardiogram and/or ambulatory monitoring at hospital discharge.

Results: Fifty-one patients had a bidirectional Glenn shunt (mean age 7.8 +/- 5.1 months) and 79 a hemi-Fontan procedure (mean age 6.9 +/- 2.8 months). The incidence of sinus node dysfunction on postoperative day 1 was significantly higher after the hemi-Fontan (36%) than after the bidirectional Glenn shunt (9.8%); however, by hospital discharge this difference was no longer apparent (hemi-Fontan [8%]; bidirectional Glenn [6%]; P = not significant). No difference in early sinus node dysfunction was discernible after the extracardiac conduit (4/30 [13%]) compared with the lateral tunnel Fontan procedure (6/46 [13%]) (P = not significant). No diagnostic or perioperative variables were predictive of sinus node dysfunction.

Conclusions: Avoidance of surgery near the sinus node has no discernible effect on the development of early sinus node dysfunction. Thus, concerns about early sinus node dysfunction should not override patient anatomy or surgeon preference as determinants of which cavopulmonary anastomosis to perform.

Citing Articles

Review of rhythm disturbances in patient after fontan completion: epidemiology, management, and surveillance.

Wall K, Hebson C, DSouza R, Balaji S Front Pediatr. 2025; 13:1506690.

PMID: 40013112 PMC: 11862918. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2025.1506690.


Long-term incidence of arrhythmias in extracardiac conduit Fontan and comparison between systemic left and right ventricle.

Di Mambro C, Yammine M, Tamborrino P, Giordano U, Righi D, Unolt M Europace. 2024; 26(5).

PMID: 38650062 PMC: 11089577. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euae097.


Single-Chamber and Dual-Chamber Pacemaker Devices in Adults with Moderate and Complex Congenital Heart Disease: A Single Tertiary Referral Center Experience.

Papaccioli G, Rocca F, Ciriello G, Correra A, Colonna D, Romeo E Pediatr Cardiol. 2024; 46(2):467-474.

PMID: 38353710 DOI: 10.1007/s00246-024-03444-6.


Changes in Heart Rate and Heart Rate Variability During Surgical Stages to Completed Fontan Circulation.

Alenius Dahlqvist J, Wiklund U, Karlsson M, Hanseus K, Stromvall Larsson E, Johansson Ramgren J Pediatr Cardiol. 2021; 42(5):1162-1169.

PMID: 33837840 PMC: 8192394. DOI: 10.1007/s00246-021-02595-0.


The intra-extracardiac Fontan: preliminary results.

Talwar S, Sengupta S, Choudhary S Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020; 36(3):193-198.

PMID: 33061125 PMC: 7525840. DOI: 10.1007/s12055-019-00862-7.