» Articles » PMID: 11038080

Incidence and Susceptibility of Pathogenic Bacteria Vary Between Intensive Care Units Within a Single Hospital: Implications for Empiric Antibiotic Strategies

Overview
Journal J Trauma
Specialty Emergency Medicine
Date 2000 Oct 19
PMID 11038080
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the incidence of recovery and patterns of antibiotic susceptibility of pathogenic bacteria vary between intensive care units (ICUs) in a single teaching hospital.

Methods: Culture and susceptibility results were collected prospectively for a 3-month period (April through June 1999) in each of the surgical, trauma, and medical ICUs. The number of unique isolates and susceptibility patterns were determined. Susceptibility of isolates among ICUs was compared with chi2.

Results: Statistically significant differences between ICUs in susceptibility to various antibiotics were found for Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus sp, Acinetobacter sp, Enterobacter sp, Klebsiella sp, and Pseudomonas sp. Notably, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus was not seen in the medical ICU, whereas it was seen in both the surgical and trauma ICUs. Klebsiella spp resistant to ceftazidime were seen only in the trauma ICU. The aminoglycosides and quinolones had attenuated activity against Pseudomonas sp in the surgical ICU, whereas they remained highly effective in the trauma ICU. Cefazolin had no activity against the Enterobacter sp in either of the surgical ICUs, but was highly effective in the medical ICU.

Conclusion: Although the microbiologic results of this study should not be extrapolated to other institutions, the principle is of value. There is variability between ICUs in a single large teaching hospital in susceptibility of bacterial pathogens to various antibiotics. This may have implications in the design of empiric antibiotic strategies and the planning of the hospital formulary. Hospital wide or composite ICU antibiograms are inadequate for planning empiric therapy in the ICU.

Citing Articles

[Management of nosocomial pneumonia-state of the art].

Welte T Intensivmed Notfallmed. 2020; 43(4):301-309.

PMID: 32287633 PMC: 7101873. DOI: 10.1007/s00390-006-0721-2.


Pneumonia in Trauma Patients.

Schellenberg M, Inaba K Curr Trauma Rep. 2020; 3(4):308-314.

PMID: 32226724 PMC: 7100823. DOI: 10.1007/s40719-017-0105-z.


Dynamics of microbiota during mechanical ventilation in aspiration pneumonia.

Otsuji K, Fukuda K, Ogawa M, Fujino Y, Kamochi M, Saito M BMC Pulm Med. 2019; 19(1):260.

PMID: 31870355 PMC: 6929358. DOI: 10.1186/s12890-019-1021-5.


A 2000 patient retrospective assessment of a new strategy for burn wound management in view of infection prevention and treatment.

Glik J, Labus W, Kitala D, Mikus-Zagorska K, Roberts C, Nowak M Int Wound J. 2017; 15(3):344-349.

PMID: 29243368 PMC: 7949883. DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12871.


Management of Adults With Hospital-acquired and Ventilator-associated Pneumonia: 2016 Clinical Practice Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Thoracic Society.

Kalil A, Metersky M, Klompas M, Muscedere J, Sweeney D, Palmer L Clin Infect Dis. 2016; 63(5):e61-e111.

PMID: 27418577 PMC: 4981759. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciw353.