» Articles » PMID: 11020504

Initial IVF-ET Experience with Assisted Hatching Performed 3 Days After Retrieval Followed by Day 5 Embryo Transfer

Overview
Journal Fertil Steril
Date 2000 Oct 6
PMID 11020504
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To report our initial IVF-ET experience combining assisted hatching performed 3 days after oocyte retrieval with day 5 embryo transfer (ET).

Design: Retrospective review of 110 consecutive IVF cycles not involving donor oocytes, including 16 cycles that involved assisted hatching performed 3 days after oocyte retrieval in combination with day 5 ET.

Setting: Academic teaching hospital IVF center.

Patient(s): Eighty-six consecutive IVF patients undergoing ET.

Intervention(s): Assisted hatching using acid Tyrode's solution performed 3 days after oocyte retrieval in selected cases in combination with day 3 or 5 ETs.

Main Outcome Measure(s): Clinical pregnancy rate per ET.

Result(s): Of the 16 women undergoing day 5 ET following day 3 assisted hatching, 14 had a clinical pregnancy. These included 11 ongoing/delivered singletons and 2 ongoing/delivered twin pregnancies, neither of which was monochorionic. These clinical and ongoing/delivered pregnancy rates compared very favorably with those of 54% and 46%, respectively, for the 35 patients undergoing day 5 ETs without assisted hatching, even though the latter group appeared to be better IVF candidates based on the prognostic factors commonly used to predict success.

Conclusion(s): Our experience suggests that day 3 assisted hatching followed by day 5 ET may be a useful combination in selected patients. Although not seen in our small series, an increased risk of monochorionic pregnancies remains a theoretical concern when such a combination is used, since both assisted hatching and blastocyst transfers have been independently linked to an increased risk in some reports.

Citing Articles

Vitrification of human blastocysts for couples undergoing assisted reproduction: an updated review.

Sciorio R, Tramontano L, Campos G, Greco P, Mondrone G, Surbone A Front Cell Dev Biol. 2024; 12:1398049.

PMID: 38827525 PMC: 11140474. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1398049.


The Current Practice of Assisted Hatching for Embryos in Fertility Centres: a General Survey.

Liu Y, Jones C, Coward K Reprod Sci. 2022; 29(9):2664-2673.

PMID: 35411451 PMC: 9444829. DOI: 10.1007/s43032-022-00931-0.


Chemical removal of zona pellucida versus laser assisted hatching after repeated failures of assisted reproductive technology.

Nishio E, Moriwaki T, Yoshii K, Udagawa Y Reprod Med Biol. 2018; 5(4):263-267.

PMID: 29699255 PMC: 5904657. DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-0578.2006.00151.x.


Assisted hatching using a 1.48-µm diode laser: Evaluation of zona opening and zona thinning techniques in human embryos.

Yano K, Kubo T, Ohashi I, Yano C Reprod Med Biol. 2018; 5(3):221-226.

PMID: 29699251 PMC: 5906858. DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-0578.2006.00145.x.


Revisiting embryo assisted hatching approaches: a systematic review of the current protocols.

Alteri A, Vigano P, Maizar A, Jovine L, Giacomini E, Rubino P J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018; 35(3):367-391.

PMID: 29350315 PMC: 5904073. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-018-1118-4.