» Articles » PMID: 11019625

Effects of Subphonetic and Syllable Structure Variation on Word Recognition

Overview
Specialties Psychiatry
Psychology
Date 2000 Oct 6
PMID 11019625
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study explored whether natural acoustic variations as exemplified by either subphonetic changes or syllable structure changes affect word recognition processes. Subphonetic variations were realized by differences in the voice-onset time (VOT) value of initial voiceless stop consonants, and syllable structure variations were realized by vowel deletion in initial unstressed syllables in multisyllable words. An auditory identity priming paradigm was used to determine whether the amount of facilitation obtained to a target stimulus in a lexical decision task was affected by the presence of these acoustic variations in a prime stimulus. Results revealed different patterns for the two types of variability as a function of lexical status. In the case of subphonetic variations, shortening of VOT resulted in reduced facilitation for words but not for nonwords, whereas in the case of syllable structure variation, vowel deletion in an unstressed syllable resulted in reduced facilitation for nonwords and increased facilitation for words. These findings indicate that subphonetic variability interferes with word recognition, whereas syllable structure variability does not, and that this effect is independent of the magnitude of the acoustic difference between a citation form and its variant. Furthermore, the results suggest that the lexical status of the target item plays a crucial role in the processing of both types of variability. Results are considered in relation to current models of word recognition.

Citing Articles

The Effect of Habitual Speech Rate on Speaker-Specific Processing in English Stop Voicing Perception.

Ting C, Kang Y Lang Speech. 2023; 67(3):692-701.

PMID: 37555541 PMC: 11367799. DOI: 10.1177/00238309231188078.


Don't force it! Gradient speech categorization calls for continuous categorization tasks.

Apfelbaum K, Kutlu E, McMurray B, Kapnoula E J Acoust Soc Am. 2022; 152(6):3728.

PMID: 36586841 PMC: 9894657. DOI: 10.1121/10.0015201.


Idiosyncratic use of bottom-up and top-down information leads to differences in speech perception flexibility: Converging evidence from ERPs and eye-tracking.

Kapnoula E, McMurray B Brain Lang. 2021; 223:105031.

PMID: 34628259 PMC: 11251822. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2021.105031.


Gradient activation of speech categories facilitates listeners' recovery from lexical garden paths, but not perception of speech-in-noise.

Kapnoula E, Edwards J, McMurray B J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2021; 47(4):578-595.

PMID: 33983791 PMC: 9069052. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000900.


Tailored perception: Individuals' speech and music perception strategies fit their perceptual abilities.

Jasmin K, Dick F, Holt L, Tierney A J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019; 149(5):914-934.

PMID: 31589067 PMC: 7133494. DOI: 10.1037/xge0000688.