» Articles » PMID: 11013501

Differences in Repositioning Error Among Patients with Low Back Pain Compared with Control Subjects

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2000 Oct 3
PMID 11013501
Citations 46
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Study Design: Trunk repositioning error was measured in 20 patients with chronic low back pain and 20 control subjects.

Objectives: To measure trunk repositioning error as a method of measuring proprioception of the low back and to compare trunk repositioning error in patients with low back pain and in control subjects.

Summary Of Background Data: Although many current low back pain rehabilitation programs incorporate proprioceptive training, very little research has been performed on proprioception of the low back.

Methods: While standing with the legs and pelvis immobilized, the subject bent the trunk to a predetermined target position and then attempted to replicate the position. Repositioning error was calculated as the absolute difference between the actual target position and the subject-perceived target position. The multiple target positions in the frontal and sagittal planes were tested. Trunk position was measured with a 3Space Tracker, which analyzes the three-dimensional position of the body.

Results: Repositioning error in patients with low back pain was significantly higher than that of control subjects in flexion, and significantly lower than that of control subjects in extension.

Conclusions: The increase in repositioning error of patients with low back pain during flexion implies that some aspects of proprioception are lost in patients with low back pain. The decrease in repositioning error in patients with low back pain in extension is not as easily explained, but could possibly be caused by increased activation of mechanoreceptors in facet joints.

Citing Articles

Wearable technology mediated biofeedback to modulate spine motor control: a scoping review.

Battis A, Norrie J, McMaster H, Beaudette S BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):770.

PMID: 39354458 PMC: 11446096. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07867-3.


Effects of different treatments on pain, functional disability, position sense and range of motion in elite bodybuilders with chronic low back pain.

Papoli A, Hosseini S, Mirkarimpour S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):9176.

PMID: 38649771 PMC: 11035542. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-59684-2.


Distinction of non-specific low back pain patients with proprioceptive disorders from healthy individuals by linear discriminant analysis.

Shokouhyan S, Davoudi M, Hoviattalab M, Abedi M, Bervis S, Parnianpour M Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022; 10:1078805.

PMID: 36582840 PMC: 9792676. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1078805.


Analysis of the Effect of Wearing Extensible and Non-Extensible Lumbar Belts on Biomechanical Factors of the Sit-to-Stand Movement and Pain-Related Psychological Factors Affecting Office Workers with Low Back Pain.

Im S, Cho H, Lee J, Kim K Healthcare (Basel). 2021; 9(11).

PMID: 34828646 PMC: 8624328. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare9111601.


Impairment of Proprioception in Young Adult Nonradicular Patients with Lumbar Derangement Syndrome.

Olszewska-Karaban M, Permoda-Bialozorczyk A, Dabrowska A, Bandurska E, Permoda A, Zajt J Biomed Res Int. 2021; 2021:5550257.

PMID: 34660792 PMC: 8516538. DOI: 10.1155/2021/5550257.