Eyeblink Conditioning in the Freely Moving Rat: Square-wave Stimulation As the Unconditioned Stimulus
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
The freely-moving rat model of eyeblink conditioning has been gaining popularity as a model of associative learning. The most commonly used preparation uses subcutaneous electrodes to deliver the unconditioned stimulus (US), which has usually been a 60-Hz electrical shock. However, measurement of the unconditioned response (UR) has been controversial, because the US (SHOCK) interferes with electromyograph (EMG) activity if measured shortly after US delivery. Here, we present a modification of eyeblink conditioning in the freely-moving rat that uses a square-wave stimulation as the US. Videographic evidence demonstrated that use of stimulation allowed eyelid opening to be evaluated in EMG activity. A parametric study demonstrated that: (1) the stimulation US supported acquisition of the eyeblink conditioned response (CR); (2) stimulation intensity was reflected in UR amplitude; and; (3) UR amplitude decreased with acquisition of the eyeblink CR. The stimulation US fulfils the basic criteria for a US, while allowing delivery of the US through subcutaneous electrodes. Thus, the stimulation US is a viable alternative for eyeblink conditioning in the freely-moving rat preparation.
Theoretical analysis of neuronal network's response under different stimulus.
Xue H, Lu Z, Lan Y, Gui L, Sun X PLoS One. 2024; 19(12):e0314962.
PMID: 39705241 PMC: 11661631. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314962.
Handy J, Wright W, Haskell A, Servatius L, Servatius R Front Behav Neurosci. 2020; 14:595007.
PMID: 33363458 PMC: 7752806. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2020.595007.
Gap-induced inhibition of the post-auricular muscle response in humans and guinea pigs.
Wilson C, Berger J, de Boer J, Sereda M, Palmer A, Hall D Hear Res. 2019; 374:13-23.
PMID: 30685571 PMC: 6408328. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2019.01.009.
Beck K, Jiao X, Smith I, Myers C, Pang K, Servatius R Front Behav Neurosci. 2014; 8:403.
PMID: 25484860 PMC: 4240176. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00403.
Roland J, Janke K, Servatius R, Pang K Brain Struct Funct. 2014; 219(4):1231-7.
PMID: 24965560 PMC: 4073235. DOI: 10.1007/s00429-013-0560-4.