» Articles » PMID: 10995430

The Reduction of Chromosome Number in Meiosis is Determined by Properties Built into the Chromosomes

Overview
Journal J Cell Biol
Specialty Cell Biology
Date 2000 Sep 20
PMID 10995430
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In meiosis I, two chromatids move to each spindle pole. Then, in meiosis II, the two are distributed, one to each future gamete. This requires that meiosis I chromosomes attach to the spindle differently than meiosis II chromosomes and that they regulate chromosome cohesion differently. We investigated whether the information that dictates the division type of the chromosome comes from the whole cell, the spindle, or the chromosome itself. Also, we determined when chromosomes can switch from meiosis I behavior to meiosis II behavior. We used a micromanipulation needle to fuse grasshopper spermatocytes in meiosis I to spermatocytes in meiosis II, and to move chromosomes from one spindle to the other. Chromosomes placed on spindles of a different meiotic division always behaved as they would have on their native spindle; e.g., a meiosis I chromosome attached to a meiosis II spindle in its normal fashion and sister chromatids moved together to the same spindle pole. We also showed that meiosis I chromosomes become competent meiosis II chromosomes in anaphase of meiosis I, but not before. The patterns for attachment to the spindle and regulation of cohesion are built into the chromosome itself. These results suggest that regulation of chromosome cohesion may be linked to differences in the arrangement of kinetochores in the two meiotic divisions.

Citing Articles

Chromosome-level assembly of and comparative genomic analyses shed light on genome evolution in Lamiales.

Chen B, Li D, Luo K, Jiu S, Dong X, Wang W Front Plant Sci. 2024; 15:1444234.

PMID: 39157518 PMC: 11327160. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1444234.


Meiosis-specific functions of kinetochore protein SPC105R required for chromosome segregation in oocytes.

Joshi J, Changela N, Mahal L, Jang J, Defosse T, Wang L Mol Biol Cell. 2024; 35(8):ar105.

PMID: 38865189 PMC: 11321039. DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E24-02-0067.


Meiosis-specific functions of kinetochore protein SPC105R required for chromosome segregation in oocytes.

Joshi J, Changela N, Mahal L, Defosse T, Jang J, Wang L bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38559067 PMC: 10980020. DOI: 10.1101/2024.03.14.585003.


The Four Causes: The Functional Architecture of Centromeres and Kinetochores.

McAinsh A, Marston A Annu Rev Genet. 2022; 56:279-314.

PMID: 36055650 PMC: 7614391. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genet-072820-034559.


Asynapsis and unreduced gamete formation in a Trifolium interspecific hybrid.

Ansari H, Ellison N, Verry I, Williams W BMC Plant Biol. 2022; 22(1):14.

PMID: 34979930 PMC: 8722210. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-021-03403-w.


References
1.
Rebollo E, Arana P . A comparative study of orientation at behavior of univalent in living grasshopper spermatocytes. Chromosoma. 1995; 104(1):56-67. DOI: 10.1007/BF00352226. View

2.
Suja J, Antonio C, Rufas J . Involvement of chromatid cohesiveness at the centromere and chromosome arms in meiotic chromosome segregation: a cytological approach. Chromosoma. 1992; 101(8):493-501. DOI: 10.1007/BF00352472. View

3.
Bickel S . Holding chromatids together to ensure they go their separate ways. Bioessays. 1996; 18(4):293-300. DOI: 10.1002/bies.950180407. View

4.
Moore D . Chromosome segregation during meiosis: building an unambivalent bivalent. Curr Top Dev Biol. 1997; 37:263-99. DOI: 10.1016/s0070-2153(08)60177-5. View

5.
Gimenez-Abian J, Clarke D, de la Vega C, Gimenez-Martin G . The role of sister chromatid cohesiveness and structure in meiotic behaviour. Chromosoma. 1998; 106(7):422-34. DOI: 10.1007/s004120050264. View