» Articles » PMID: 10984515

Folding Simulations of a Three-stranded Antiparallel Beta -sheet Peptide

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2000 Sep 14
PMID 10984515
Citations 54
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Protein folding is a grand challenge of the postgenomic era. In this paper, 58 folding events sampled during 47 molecular dynamics trajectories for a total simulation time of more than 4 micros provide an atomic detail picture of the folding of a 20-residue synthetic peptide with a stable three-stranded antiparallel beta-sheet fold. The simulations successfully reproduce the NMR solution conformation, irrespective of the starting structure. The sampling of the conformational space is sufficient to determine the free energy surface and localize the minima and transition states. The statistically predominant folding pathway involves the formation of contacts between strands 2 and 3, starting with the side chains close to the turn, followed by association of the N-terminal strand onto the preformed 2-3 beta-hairpin. The folding mechanism presented here, formation of a beta-hairpin followed by consolidation, is in agreement with a computational study of the free energy surface of another synthetic three-stranded antiparallel beta-sheet by Bursulaya and Brooks [(1999) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121, 9947-9951]. Hence, it might hold in general for antiparallel beta-sheets with short turns.

Citing Articles

Applications of Molecular Dynamics Simulation in Structure Prediction of Peptides and Proteins.

Geng H, Chen F, Ye J, Jiang F Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2019; 17:1162-1170.

PMID: 31462972 PMC: 6709365. DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2019.07.010.


Peptide and Protein Structure Prediction with a Simplified Continuum Solvent Model.

Steinbach P J Phys Chem B. 2018; 122(49):11355-11362.

PMID: 30230838 PMC: 6741432. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b07264.


Enhancing coevolution-based contact prediction by imposing structural self-consistency of the contacts.

Kassem M, Christoffersen L, Cavalli A, Lindorff-Larsen K Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):11112.

PMID: 30042380 PMC: 6057941. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-29357-y.


Model structures of inactive and peptide agonist bound C5aR: Insights into agonist binding, selectivity and activation.

Rana S, Sahoo A Biochem Biophys Rep. 2017; 1:85-96.

PMID: 29124137 PMC: 5668562. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2015.03.002.


High-Resolution Mapping of the Folding Transition State of a WW Domain.

Dave K, Jager M, Nguyen H, Kelly J, Gruebele M J Mol Biol. 2016; 428(8):1617-36.

PMID: 26880334 PMC: 4835268. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.02.008.


References
1.
Ferrara P, Apostolakis J, Caflisch A . Computer simulations of protein folding by targeted molecular dynamics. Proteins. 2000; 39(3):252-60. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0134(20000515)39:3<252::aid-prot80>3.0.co;2-3. View

2.
Imperiali B, Ottesen J . Uniquely folded mini-protein motifs. J Pept Res. 1999; 54(3):177-84. DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-3011.1999.00121.x. View

3.
Kabsch W, Sander C . Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers. 1983; 22(12):2577-637. DOI: 10.1002/bip.360221211. View

4.
Eisenberg D, McLachlan A . Solvation energy in protein folding and binding. Nature. 1986; 319(6050):199-203. DOI: 10.1038/319199a0. View

5.
Caflisch A, Karplus M . Molecular dynamics simulation of protein denaturation: solvation of the hydrophobic cores and secondary structure of barnase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994; 91(5):1746-50. PMC: 43240. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.91.5.1746. View