Lymph Node Staging in Gastric Cancer: is Location More Important Than Number? An Analysis of 1,038 Patients

Overview

Journal Ann Surg

Specialty General Surgery

Date 2000 Sep 6

PMID 10973386

Citations 114

Authors

M S Karpeh

L Leon

D Klimstra

M F Brennan

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the impact of staging systems on the survival of 1,038 patients with gastric cancer undergoing resection for cure in a North American center.

Summary Background Data: In 1997, the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and the Union Internationale Contre le Cancer redefined N stage in gastric cancer. The number of involved nodes rather than their location defines N, and a minimum of 15 examined lymph nodes is recommended for adequate staging. In the 1988 AJCC N-staging system, N1 and N2 node metastases were defined as within 3 cm or more than 3 cm of the primary; the 1997 AJCC N stages were defined as N1 = 1 to 6 positive nodes, N2 = 7 to 15 positive nodes, and N3 = more than 15 positive nodes.

Methods: Between 1985 and 1999, 1,038 patients underwent an R0 resection. Median and 5-year survival rates were compared and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate median survival.

Results: The location of positive nodes did not significantly affect median survival when analyzed by the number of positive nodes. In contrast, the number of positive lymph nodes had a profound influence on survival. The new N categories served as a better discriminator of median survival when 15 or more nodes were examined. Survival estimates for stages II, IIIA, and IIIB were significantly influenced by examining 15 or more nodes.

Conclusion: The number of positive nodes best defines the prognostic influence of metastatic lymph nodes in gastric cancer. Survival estimates based on the number of involved nodes are better represented when at least 15 nodes are examined.

Citing Articles

Comparative study of ICG and non-ICG-guided laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis at a single center.

Van Du N, Anh Tuan N, Ngoc Cuong L BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol. 2025; 7(1):e000313.

PMID: 40051652 PMC: 11883552. DOI: 10.1136/bmjsit-2024-000313.

Development of a Prognostic Nomogram for Overall Survival in Gastric Cancer Patients Who Underwent Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy.

Yilmaz M, Hurmuz P, Dag O, Yigit E, Ozyurek Y, Avci H J Gastrointest Cancer. 2025; 56(1):39.

PMID: 39798000 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-025-01167-2.

D2 Lymphadenectomy for Gastric Cancer: Advancements and Technical Considerations.

Dehal A, Woo Y, Glazer E, Davis J, Strong V Ann Surg Oncol. 2024; 32(3):2129-2140.

PMID: 39589578 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-16545-6.

The Diagnostic Impact of Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography (CECT) in Evaluating Lymph Node Involvement in Colorectal Cancer: A Comprehensive Review.

Inamdar A, Shinde R Cureus. 2024; 16(6):e61832.

PMID: 38975400 PMC: 11227440. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.61832.

Association between number of dissected lymph nodes and survival in patients undergoing resection for clinical stage IA pure solid lung adenocarcinoma: a retrospective analysis.

Rong Y, Liu J, Han N, Shi Z, Jiang T, Zhang N BMC Pulm Med. 2023; 23(1):401.

PMID: 37865730 PMC: 10590513. DOI: 10.1186/s12890-023-02675-2.

References

Wu C, Hsieh M, Lo S, Tsay S, Lui W, Peng F . Relation of number of positive lymph nodes to the prognosis of patients with primary gastric adenocarcinoma. Gut. 1996; 38(4):525-7. PMC: 1383108. DOI: 10.1136/gut.38.4.525. View

Bunt A, Hermans J, van de Velde C, Sasako M, Hoefsloot F, Fleuren G . Lymph node retrieval in a randomized trial on western-type versus Japanese-type surgery in gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1996; 14(8):2289-94. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.8.2289. View

Sobin L, FLEMING I . TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors, fifth edition (1997). Union Internationale Contre le Cancer and the American Joint Committee on Cancer. Cancer. 1997; 80(9):1803-4. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19971101)80:9<1803::aid-cncr16>3.0.co;2-9. View

Roder J, Bottcher K, Busch R, Wittekind C, Hermanek P, Siewert J . Classification of regional lymph node metastasis from gastric carcinoma. German Gastric Cancer Study Group. Cancer. 1998; 82(4):621-31. View

Kodera Y, Yamamura Y, Shimizu Y, Torii A, Hirai T, Yasui K . The number of metastatic lymph nodes: a promising prognostic determinant for gastric carcinoma in the latest edition of the TNM classification. J Am Coll Surg. 1998; 187(6):597-603. DOI: 10.1016/s1072-7515(98)00229-4. View

Fujii K, Isozaki H, Okajima K, Nomura E, Niki M, Sako S . Clinical evaluation of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer defined by the fifth edition of the TNM classification in comparison with the Japanese system. Br J Surg. 1999; 86(5):685-9. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01115.x. View

Ichikura T, Tomimatsu S, Uefuji K, Kimura M, Uchida T, Morita D . Evaluation of the New American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union against cancer classification of lymph node metastasis from gastric carcinoma in comparison with the Japanese classification. Cancer. 1999; 86(4):553-8. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19990815)86:4<553::aid-cncr2>3.0.co;2-d. View

Hayashi H, Ochiai T, Suzuki T, Shimada H, Hori S, Takeda A . Superiority of a new UICC-TNM staging system for gastric carcinoma. Surgery. 2000; 127(2):129-35. DOI: 10.1067/msy.2000.102171. View

Kennedy B . T N M classification for stomach cancer. Cancer. 1970; 26(5):971-83. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(197011)26:5<971::aid-cncr2820260503>3.0.co;2-r. View

10.

Shiu M, Moore E, Sanders M, Huvos A, Freedman B, Goodbold J . Influence of the extent of resection on survival after curative treatment of gastric carcinoma. A retrospective multivariate analysis. Arch Surg. 1987; 122(11):1347-51. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1987.01400230135024. View

11.

Rohde H, Gebbensleben B, Bauer P, Stutzer H, Zieschang J . Has there been any improvement in the staging of gastric cancer? Findings from the German Gastric Cancer TNM Study Group. Cancer. 1989; 64(12):2465-81. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19891215)64:12<2465::aid-cncr2820641212>3.0.co;2-y. View

12.

Candela F, Urmacher C, Brennan M . Comparison of the conventional method of lymph node staging with a comprehensive fat-clearing method for gastric adenocarcinoma. Cancer. 1990; 66(8):1828-32. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19901015)66:8<1828::aid-cncr2820660830>3.0.co;2-z. View

13.

Makino M, Moriwaki S, Yonekawa M, Oota M, Kimura O, Kaibara N . Prognostic significance of the number of metastatic lymph nodes in patients with gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol. 1991; 47(1):12-6. DOI: 10.1002/jso.2930470104. View

14.

Nio Y, Tsubono M, Kawabata K, Masai Y, Hayashi H, Meyer C . Comparison of survival curves of gastric cancer patients after surgery according to the UICC stage classification and the General Rules for Gastric Cancer Study by the Japanese Research Society for gastric cancer. Ann Surg. 1993; 218(1):47-53. PMC: 1242899. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199307000-00008. View

15.

Isozaki H, Okajima K, Kawashima Y, Yamada S, Nakata E, Nishimura J . Prognostic value of the number of metastatic lymph nodes in gastric cancer with radical surgery. J Surg Oncol. 1993; 53(4):247-51. DOI: 10.1002/jso.2930530412. View

16.

Wanebo H, Kennedy B, CHMIEL J, Steele Jr G, Winchester D, Osteen R . Cancer of the stomach. A patient care study by the American College of Surgeons. Ann Surg. 1993; 218(5):583-92. PMC: 1243028. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199321850-00002. View

17.

Lee W, Lee P, Yue S, Chang K, Wei T, Chen K . Lymph node metastases in gastric cancer: significance of positive number. Oncology. 1995; 52(1):45-50. DOI: 10.1159/000227426. View

18.

Adachi Y, Oshiro T, Okuyama T, Kamakura T, Mori M, Maehara Y . A simple classification of lymph node level in gastric carcinoma. Am J Surg. 1995; 169(4):382-5. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(99)80181-0. View

19.

Hermanek P, Wittekind C . News of TNM and its use for classification of gastric cancer. World J Surg. 1995; 19(4):491-5. DOI: 10.1007/BF00294707. View

20.

Jatzko G, Lisborg P, Denk H, Klimpfinger M, Stettner H . A 10-year experience with Japanese-type radical lymph node dissection for gastric cancer outside of Japan. Cancer. 1995; 76(8):1302-12. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19951015)76:8<1302::aid-cncr2820760803>3.0.co;2-8. View