Morbidity and Mortality in Patients Randomised to Double-blind Treatment with a Long-acting Calcium-channel Blocker or Diuretic in the International Nifedipine GITS Study: Intervention As a Goal in Hypertension Treatment (INSIGHT)
Overview
Affiliations
Background: The efficacy of antihypertensive drugs newer than diuretics and beta-blockers has not been established. We compared the effects of the calcium-channel blocker nifedipine once daily with the diuretic combination co-amilozide on cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in high-risk patients with hypertension.
Methods: We did a prospective, randomised, double-blind trial in Europe and Israel in 6321 patients aged 55-80 years with hypertension (blood pressure > or = 150/95 mm Hg, or > or = 160 mm Hg systolic). Patients had at least one additional cardiovascular risk factor. We randomly assigned patients nifedipine 30 mg in a long-acting gastrointestinal-transport-system (GITS) formulation (n=3157), or co-amilozide (hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg [corrected] plus amiloride 2.5 mg; n=3164). Dose titration was by dose doubling, and addition of atenolol 25-50 mg or enalapril 5-10 mg. The primary outcome was cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, heart failure, or stroke. Analysis was done by intention to treat.
Findings: Primary outcomes occurred in 200 (6.3%) patients in the nifedipine group and in 182 (5.8%) in the co-amilozide group (18.2 vs 16.5 events per 1000 patient-years; relative risk 1.10 [95% CI 0.91-1.34], p=0.35). Overall mean blood pressure fell from 173/99 mm Hg (SD 14/8) to 138/82 mm Hg (12/7). There was an 8% excess of withdrawals from the nifedipine group because of peripheral oedema (725 vs 518, p<0.0001), but serious adverse events were more frequent in the co-amilozide group (880 vs 796, p=0.02). Deaths were mainly non-vascular (nifedipine 176 vs co-amilozide 172; p=0.81). 80% of the primary events occurred in patients receiving randomised treatment (157 nifedipine, 147 co-amilozide, difference 0.33% [-0.7 to 1.4]).
Interpretation: Nifedipine once daily and co-amilozide were equally effective in preventing overall cardiovascular or cerebrovascular complications. The choice of drug can be decided by tolerability and blood-pressure response rather than long-term safety or efficacy.
Yu D, Li J, Cheng Y, Wang H, Ma X, Ding T PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0313309.
PMID: 39982885 PMC: 11845040. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313309.
Long-acting nifedipine in the management of essential hypertension: a review for cardiologists.
Hazra P, Mehta A, Desai B, Pandey U, Mehta K, Bajpai S Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2025; 14(6):396-413.
PMID: 39839565 PMC: 11744219. DOI: 10.62347/RPMZ6407.
Is fluid retention a cardiovascular risk factor?.
Blankfield R Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2024; 88(2):277-288.
PMID: 39302357 PMC: 11492017. DOI: 10.3233/CH-242128.
Weir M, Rossignol P, Pitt B, Lund L, Coats A, Filippatos G Am J Nephrol. 2024; 55(6):672-689.
PMID: 39159624 PMC: 11651233. DOI: 10.1159/000540453.
Natural L-type calcium channels antagonists from Chinese medicine.
Xu F, Cai W, Liu B, Qiu Z, Zhang X Chin Med. 2024; 19(1):72.
PMID: 38773596 PMC: 11107034. DOI: 10.1186/s13020-024-00944-8.