» Articles » PMID: 10948259

Local and Systemic Changes in Squash Gene Expression in Response to Silverleaf Whitefly Feeding

Overview
Journal Plant Cell
Specialties Biology
Cell Biology
Date 2000 Aug 19
PMID 10948259
Citations 38
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Squash genes (SLW1 and SLW3) induced systemically after silverleaf whitefly feeding were identified. Differences in the local and systemic expression of SLW1 and SLW3 after feeding by the closely related silverleaf and sweetpotato whiteflies were observed. Temporal and spatial studies showed that SLW1 and SLW3 were induced when second, third, and fourth nymphal instars were feeding. Although only barely detected after wounding and bacterial infection, SLW1 and SLW3 RNAs were abundant during water-deficit stress. Treatments with wound/defense signal molecules showed that SLW1 RNAs accumulated in response to methyl jasmonate and ethylene, whereas SLW3 was not regulated by known wound/defense signals, suggesting utilization of a novel mechanism for defense signal transduction. SLW1 RNAs accumulated during floral and fruit development, whereas SLW3 RNAs were not detected during vegetative or reproductive development. The potential roles of SLW1, an M20b peptidase-like protein, and SLW3, a beta-glucosidase-like protein, in defense and the leaf-silvering disorder are discussed.

Citing Articles

Genome-wide identification of glycoside hydrolase family 1 members reveals GeBGL1 and GeBGL9 for degrading gastrodin in Gastrodia elata.

Jiang M, Yan Y, Dong H, Wang X Plant Cell Rep. 2024; 43(9):214.

PMID: 39133328 DOI: 10.1007/s00299-024-03299-4.


Plant resistance against whitefly and its engineering.

Li D, Li H, Zhang J, Wu Y, Zhao S, Liu S Front Plant Sci. 2023; 14:1232735.

PMID: 37711302 PMC: 10498545. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1232735.


Spotlight on the Roles of Whitefly Effectors in Insect-Plant Interactions.

Naalden D, van Kleeff P, Dangol S, Mastop M, Corkill R, Hogenhout S Front Plant Sci. 2021; 12:661141.

PMID: 34276723 PMC: 8283192. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.661141.


Zucchini Plants Alter Gene Expression and Emission of ()-β-Caryophyllene Following Infestation.

Vitiello A, Molisso D, Digilio M, Giorgini M, Corrado G, Bruce T Front Plant Sci. 2021; 11:592603.

PMID: 33488643 PMC: 7820395. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.592603.


spider mite populations suppress tomato defenses to varying degrees.

Knegt B, Meijer T, Kant M, Kiers E, Egas M Ecol Evol. 2020; 10(10):4375-4390.

PMID: 32489604 PMC: 7246200. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.6204.


References
1.
Rojas A, Romeu A . A sequence analysis of the beta-glucosidase sub-family B. FEBS Lett. 1996; 378(1):93-7. DOI: 10.1016/0014-5793(95)01412-8. View

2.
Pautot V, Holzer F, Reisch B, Walling L . Leucine aminopeptidase: an inducible component of the defense response in Lycopersicon esculentum (tomato). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993; 90(21):9906-10. PMC: 47681. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.90.21.9906. View

3.
Pautot V, Holzer F, Walling L . Differential expression of tomato proteinase inhibitor I and II genes during bacterial pathogen invasion and wounding. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 1991; 4(3):284-92. DOI: 10.1094/mpmi-4-284. View

4.
Pena-Cortes H, Willmitzer L, Sanchez-Serrano J . Abscisic Acid Mediates Wound Induction but Not Developmental-Specific Expression of the Proteinase Inhibitor II Gene Family. Plant Cell. 1991; 3(9):963-972. PMC: 160063. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.3.9.963. View

5.
Reiter R, Coomber S, Bourett T, Bartley G, Scolnik P . Control of leaf and chloroplast development by the Arabidopsis gene pale cress. Plant Cell. 1994; 6(9):1253-64. PMC: 160517. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.6.9.1253. View