Differential Effects of Cue Dependency on Item and Source Memory
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
The authors investigated the cue dependency of source and item memory. Individuals listened to words spoken by a man or a woman and later determined whether a test word was previously presented by a man or by a woman, or whether it was a new word. Cue dependent effects were assessed by presenting test words with (a) the same voice (match condition) that originally presented the word, (b) a different but familiar voice (mismatch condition), (c) a novel test voice (novel condition), and (d) no test voice (control condition). Compared with the control condition, source recollection was facilitated in matching-context conditions, disrupted in mismatching-context conditions, and not affected in novel test conditions. By contrast, item recognition was not affected by the match-mismatch manipulation but was significantly worse in novel test voice conditions. The authors propose an associative source interference view to account for the voice match-mismatch effects observed in source recollection.
Timing of testing affects earwitness memory.
Torrance M, Thomas A Mem Cognit. 2024; .
PMID: 39505799 DOI: 10.3758/s13421-024-01650-4.
Who said what to whom? Memory for sources and destinations in monolinguals and bilinguals.
Tsuboi N, Francis W Mem Cognit. 2024; 53(2):606-627.
PMID: 38914902 DOI: 10.3758/s13421-024-01589-6.
Carpenter C, Webb C, Overman A, Dennis N Memory. 2022; 31(1):77-91.
PMID: 36131610 PMC: 9991946. DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2022.2123524.
Sleep deprivation impairs binding of information with its context.
Kurinec C, Whitney P, Hinson J, Hansen D, Van Dongen H Sleep. 2021; 44(8).
PMID: 33940625 PMC: 8361344. DOI: 10.1093/sleep/zsab113.
Jackson J, Donaldson D, Dering B PLoS One. 2021; 16(5):e0250827.
PMID: 33939715 PMC: 8092761. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250827.