» Articles » PMID: 10901565

Umbilical Artery Doppler Studies in Small for Gestational Age Babies Reflect Disease Severity

Overview
Journal BJOG
Date 2000 Jul 20
PMID 10901565
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To determine: 1. whether abnormal umbilical artery Doppler studies were independently associated with newborn morbidity; and 2. whether small for gestational age babies with normal umbilical artery Doppler studies had small mothers and a low rate of newborn malnutrition and morbidity.

Design: Prospective observational study.

Setting: National Women's Hospital, a tertiary referral centre, Auckland, New Zealand.

Population: One hundred eighty-six women and their small for gestational age babies (birthweight < 10th%) who had been participants in one of two randomised controlled trials of small for gestational age pregnancies between 1993 and 1997.

Methods: Newborn morbidity and morphometry were compared between small for gestational age babies with normal and abnormal umbilical artery Doppler studies (resistance index > 95th%). Maternal demographic characteristics and morbidity were also compared.

Results: Compared with small for gestational age babies with normal umbilical artery Doppler studies (n = 109), small for gestational age babies with abnormal umbilical artery Doppler studies (n = 77) were diagnosed earlier in pregnancy as being small for gestational age (30.3 vs 32.9 weeks, P < 0.001), were smaller in all body proportions at birth (median Z score birthweight -1.82 vs -1.70, P = 0.004, Z score length -1.86 vs -1.36, P < 0.0001, Z score head circumference -1.31 vs -0.89, P < 0.0001) and were more likely to experience newborn morbidity. When birthweight and gestation were entered into a logistic regression model, an abnormal umbilical artery Doppler study was not an independent predictor of prolonged newborn nursery admission or hypoglycaemia. Of small for gestational age babies with normal umbilical artery Doppler studies, 53 (49%) had low ponderal indices, 26/98 (26%) were hypoglycaemic and 38 (35%) required admission to the newborn nursery. There was no difference in maternal height, weight and ethnicity between the abnormal and normal umbilical artery Doppler groups.

Conclusions: Abnormal umbilical artery Doppler studies reflect earlier onset and more severe growth restriction and are not independently associated with newborn morbidity. Small for gestational age babies with normal Doppler studies have a high rate of newborn nursery admission and malnutrition at birth and are not all just normal small babies.

Citing Articles

Role of Placental Vascularization Indices and Shear Wave Elastography in Fetal Growth Restriction.

Menon A, Meena J, Manchanda S, Singhal S, Shivhare S, Kumar S J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2023; 73(Suppl 1):75-82.

PMID: 37916019 PMC: 10615985. DOI: 10.1007/s13224-023-01826-z.


Impact of the Community-Integrated Model of Samrakshan on Perinatal Mortality and Morbidity in Guna District of Central India.

Sharma L, Choorakuttil R, Jadon D, Nirmalan P Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2023; 33(1):65-69.

PMID: 36855727 PMC: 9968535. DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1759483.


Diagnostic Effectiveness of Third-Trimester Fetal Doppler Studies in Pregnancy to Predict Late-and-Term Stillbirth and Neonatal Mortality in the Samrakshan Program in India.

Choorakuttil R, Satarkar S, Sharma L, Gupta A, Baghel A, Rajput E Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2023; 33(1):28-35.

PMID: 36855720 PMC: 9968525. DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1759637.


Prediction of late-onset fetal growth restriction by umbilical artery velocities at 37 weeks of gestation: a cross-sectional study.

Liu H, Zhang L, Luo X, Li J, Huang S, Qi H BMJ Open. 2022; 12(8):e060620.

PMID: 36041768 PMC: 9438115. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060620.


The relationship between postnatal hypoglycemia and umbilical artery Doppler ultrasonography in neonates with intrauterine growth restriction: A longitudinal follow-up study.

Sadat Tabatabaie R, Dehghan N, Mojibian M, Hosein Lookzadeh M, Namiranian N, Javaheri A Int J Reprod Biomed. 2022; 20(2):137-144.

PMID: 35434479 PMC: 9002167. DOI: 10.18502/ijrm.v20i2.10505.