» Articles » PMID: 10888664

Exo1 Roles for Repair of DNA Double-strand Breaks and Meiotic Crossing over in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae

Overview
Journal Mol Biol Cell
Date 2000 Jul 11
PMID 10888664
Citations 115
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The MRE11, RAD50, and XRS2 genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae are involved in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) produced by ionizing radiation and by radiomimetic chemicals such as methyl methanesulfonate (MMS). In these mutants, single-strand DNA degradation in a 5' to 3' direction from DSB ends is reduced. Multiple copies of the EXO1 gene, encoding a 5' to 3' double-strand DNA exonuclease, were found to suppress the high MMS sensitivity of these mutants. The exo1 single mutant shows weak MMS sensitivity. When an exo1 mutation is combined with an mre11 mutation, both repair of MMS-induced damage and processing of DSBs are more severely reduced than in either single mutant, suggesting that Exo1 and Mre11 function independently in DSB processing. During meiosis, transcription of the EXO1 gene is highly induced. In meiotic cells, the exo1 mutation reduces the processing of DSBs and the frequency of crossing over, but not the frequency of gene conversion. These results suggest that Exo1 functions in the processing of DSB ends and in meiotic crossing over.

Citing Articles

Meiosis in budding yeast.

Borner G, Hochwagen A, MacQueen A Genetics. 2023; 225(2).

PMID: 37616582 PMC: 10550323. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyad125.


DNA mismatch repair in cancer immunotherapy.

Guan J, Li G NAR Cancer. 2023; 5(3):zcad031.

PMID: 37325548 PMC: 10262306. DOI: 10.1093/narcan/zcad031.


Exo1 protects DNA nicks from ligation to promote crossover formation during meiosis.

Gioia M, Payero L, Salim S, Fajish V G, Farnaz A, Pannafino G PLoS Biol. 2023; 21(4):e3002085.

PMID: 37079643 PMC: 10153752. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002085.


Turning coldspots into hotspots: targeted recruitment of axis protein Hop1 stimulates meiotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Shodhan A, Xaver M, Wheeler D, Lichten M Genetics. 2022; 222(1).

PMID: 35876814 PMC: 9434160. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyac106.


The impact of rare germline variants on human somatic mutation processes.

Vali-Pour M, Park S, Espinosa-Carrasco J, Ortiz-Martinez D, Lehner B, Supek F Nat Commun. 2022; 13(1):3724.

PMID: 35764656 PMC: 9240060. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-31483-1.


References
1.
Sym M, Roeder G . Crossover interference is abolished in the absence of a synaptonemal complex protein. Cell. 1994; 79(2):283-92. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90197-x. View

2.
Botstein D, Falco S, Stewart S, Brennan M, Scherer S, Stinchcomb D . Sterile host yeasts (SHY): a eukaryotic system of biological containment for recombinant DNA experiments. Gene. 1979; 8(1):17-24. DOI: 10.1016/0378-1119(79)90004-0. View

3.
Rothstein R . One-step gene disruption in yeast. Methods Enzymol. 1983; 101:202-11. DOI: 10.1016/0076-6879(83)01015-0. View

4.
Alani E, Cao L, Kleckner N . A method for gene disruption that allows repeated use of URA3 selection in the construction of multiply disrupted yeast strains. Genetics. 1987; 116(4):541-5. PMC: 1203166. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.112.541.test. View

5.
Sun H, Treco D, Schultes N, Szostak J . Double-strand breaks at an initiation site for meiotic gene conversion. Nature. 1989; 338(6210):87-90. DOI: 10.1038/338087a0. View