» Articles » PMID: 10885082

Supporting Practice-based Audit: a Price to Be Paid for Collecting Data

Overview
Journal Br J Gen Pract
Specialty Public Health
Date 2000 Jul 8
PMID 10885082
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: There has been considerable investment by health authorities in the funding of support staff whose job is to collect data for audit purposes. It is important to understand what costs are involved in such a data collection exercise. The cost advantages of using existing practice staff or externally funded staff are not known.

Aim: To assess the cost of transposing data on workload to computer software for audit purposes and retrieving data on five chronic diseases from case records.

Method: Four audit support staff monitored the time taken to collect specific data as part of a broad audit programme in 12 training practices within one health board area in the West of Scotland in 1997. The time taken was used to estimate comparative costs for using a receptionist or practice nurse for carrying out a similar exercise.

Results: Average costs for collecting data per 1000 patients for waiting time, appointments, recall, and telephone audits were 5.24 Pounds for reception staff, 5.64 Pounds for audit support staff, and 9.68 Pounds for a practice nurse. The average cost for collecting data per patient with diabetes, asthma, epilepsy, hypertension, or rheumatoid arthritis was 1.48 Pounds for reception staff, 1.60 Pounds for audit support staff, and 2.74 Pounds for a practice nurse.

Conclusions: The cost of collecting data varies considerably depending on which staff are chosen for the purpose. Practices should consider carefully how best to collect data for audit in terms of cost.

Citing Articles

Morbidity and mortality audits: "How to"for family practice.

Yaffe M, Gupta G, Still S, Boillat M, Russillo B, Schiff B Can Fam Physician. 2005; 51:234-9.

PMID: 15751567 PMC: 1472972.


Do general practitioners want payment for their data collection?.

Vedsted P, Nielsen J Eur J Epidemiol. 2004; 19(6):605-6.

PMID: 15330135 DOI: 10.1023/b:ejep.0000032429.16306.19.


Measuring access to primary care appointments: a review of methods.

Jones W, Elwyn G, Edwards P, Edwards A, Emmerson M, Hibbs R BMC Fam Pract. 2003; 4:8.

PMID: 12846934 PMC: 169167. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-4-8.

References
1.
Hearnshaw H, Baker R, Robertson N . Multidisciplinary audit in primary healthcare teams: facilitation by audit support staff. Qual Health Care. 1994; 3(3):164-8. PMC: 1055221. DOI: 10.1136/qshc.3.3.164. View

2.
Baker R, Thompson J . Innovation in general practice: is the gap between training and non-training practices getting wider?. Br J Gen Pract. 1995; 45(395):297-300. PMC: 1239263. View

3.
Miles A, Bentley P, Polychronis A, Price N, Grey J . Clinical audit in the National Health Service: fact or fiction?. J Eval Clin Pract. 1996; 2(1):29-35. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.1996.tb00026.x. View

4.
Nygren E, Wyatt J, Wright P . Helping clinicians to find data and avoid delays. Lancet. 1998; 352(9138):1462-6. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)08307-4. View