» Articles » PMID: 108751

Intracranial Self-stimulation in Orbitofrontal Cortex and Caudate Nucleus of Rhesus Monkey: Effects of Apomorphine, Pimozide, and Spiroperidol

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 1979 Mar 29
PMID 108751
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Rhesus monkeys were prepared with stimulating electrodes implanted into the orbitofrontal cortex and head of the caudate nucleus under stereotaxic control. These regions of the brain contain high levels of dopamine, and intracranial self-stimulation was readily elicited from these loci in all animals tested using licking behavior as the operant response. Self-stimulation at both sites was significantly attenuated following peripheral injections of the dopamine receptor blocker spiroperidol (0.02 mg/kg). Similarly, pimozide (0.15 and 0.20 mg/kg) significantly reduced self-stimulation in the orbitofrontal cortex, but the suppression observed at caudate placements did not reach statistical significance. Licking for a reward of blackcurrant juice was unaffected by either drug. Apomorphine (0.2, 0.4 mg/kg) had a differential effect on self-stimulation. This drug significantly attenuated self-stimulation in the orbitofrontal cortex, while the same treatment tended to facilitate self-stimulation in the caudate. Apomorphine did not significantly affect responding for the fruit juice reward. The parallels between the effects of dopamine agonists and antagonists on self-stimulation in the monkey and rat suggest that dopamine influences self-stimulation of some sites in both the primate and the rat.

Citing Articles

Individual differences in response to positive and negative stimuli: endocannabinoid-based insight on approach and avoidance behaviors.

Laricchiuta D, Petrosini L Front Syst Neurosci. 2015; 8:238.

PMID: 25565991 PMC: 4273613. DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00238.


Striatal mechanisms underlying movement, reinforcement, and punishment.

Kravitz A, Kreitzer A Physiology (Bethesda). 2012; 27(3):167-77.

PMID: 22689792 PMC: 3880226. DOI: 10.1152/physiol.00004.2012.


Facilitation of saccadic eye movements by postsaccadic electrical stimulation in the primate caudate.

Nakamura K, Hikosaka O J Neurosci. 2006; 26(50):12885-95.

PMID: 17167079 PMC: 6674951. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3688-06.2006.


Understanding obsessive-compulsive disorder: focus on decision making.

Cavedini P, Gorini A, Bellodi L Neuropsychol Rev. 2006; 16(1):3-15.

PMID: 16708289 DOI: 10.1007/s11065-006-9001-y.


Brain site variations in effects of morphine on electrical self-stimulation.

Nelson Jr W, Steiner S, Brutus M, Farrell R, Ellman S Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1981; 74(1):58-65.

PMID: 6791206 DOI: 10.1007/BF00431758.

References
1.
MacBrown R, Goldman P . Catecholamines in neocortex of rhesus monkeys: regional distribution and ontogenetic development. Brain Res. 1977; 124(3):576-80. DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(77)90960-x. View

2.
Wauquier A, NIEMEGEERS C . Intracranial self-stimulation in rats as a function of various stimulus parameters. 3. Influence of apomorphine on medial forebrain bundle stimulation with monopolar electrodes. Psychopharmacologia. 1973; 30(2):163-72. DOI: 10.1007/BF00421431. View

3.
Mora F, Phillips A, Koolhaas J, Rolls E . Prefrontal cortex and neostriatum self-stimulation in the rat: differential effects produced by apomorphine. Brain Res Bull. 1976; 1(5):421-4. DOI: 10.1016/0361-9230(76)90110-6. View

4.
Routtenberg A, Sloan M . Self-stimulation in the frontal cortex of Rattus norvegicus. Behav Biol. 1972; 7(4):567-72. DOI: 10.1016/s0091-6773(72)80218-9. View

5.
Herberg L, Stephens D, Franklin K . Catecholamines and self-stimulation: evidence suggesting a reinforcing role for noradrenaline and a motivating role for dopamine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1976; 4(5):575-82. DOI: 10.1016/0091-3057(76)90200-8. View