» Articles » PMID: 10862722

Three-dimensional Loading and Growth of the Zygomatic Arch

Overview
Journal J Exp Biol
Specialty Biology
Date 2000 Jun 23
PMID 10862722
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Despite a number of previous biomechanical studies on the zygomatic arch, unanswered questions remain about its three-dimensional loading and growth. Using young miniature swine, we have for the first time recorded strains from both the medial and lateral aspects of the squamosal bone during mastication and masseter muscle stimulation. Strains from the zygomatic bone flange and zygomatic arch growth data were also obtained from the same animals. A second study on a younger group of animals examined the growth of the zygomatic flange following partial removal of the masseter. Strain data indicated that the squamosal bone is bent out-of-plane and that this pattern of loading is quite different from that of the adjacent zygomatic bone, which experiences much lower strains with little evidence of out-of-plane bending. Surprisingly, strains were higher in the zygomatic flange during contralateral chews and contralateral masseter stimulations than during ipsilateral chews/stimulations. These strains proved to arise from movement of the condyle, explaining why partial removal of the masseter had little effect on the growth of the flange. Other growth results indicated an approximately threefold greater rate of subperiosteal deposition on the lateral surface of the squamosal bone than on the zygomatic bone. This difference in growth rate is attributed to the presence of sutures that contribute to the lateral displacement of the zygomatic bone but not the squamosal bone. This explanation does not exclude the possibility that the rapid apposition on the lateral squamosal surface is regulated by the high surface strains that result from out-of-plane bending.

Citing Articles

Geometric Mismatch Promotes Anatomic Repair in Periorbital Bony Defects in Skeletally Mature Yucatan Minipigs.

Singh S, Zhou Y, Farris A, Whitehead E, Nyberg E, OSullivan A Adv Healthc Mater. 2023; 12(29):e2301944.

PMID: 37565378 PMC: 10840722. DOI: 10.1002/adhm.202301944.


Flexible conservatism in the skull modularity of convergently evolved myrmecophagous placental mammals.

Ferreira-Cardoso S, Claude J, Goswami A, Delsuc F, Hautier L BMC Ecol Evol. 2022; 22(1):87.

PMID: 35773630 PMC: 9248141. DOI: 10.1186/s12862-022-02030-9.


Functional tooth mobility in young pigs.

Salamati A, Chen J, Herring S, Liu Z J Biomech. 2020; 104:109716.

PMID: 32173029 PMC: 7510378. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109716.


The Biomechanics of Zygomatic Arch Shape.

Smith A, Grosse I Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2016; 299(12):1734-1752.

PMID: 27870343 PMC: 5726875. DOI: 10.1002/ar.23484.


Concise review: personalized human bone grafts for reconstructing head and face.

Bhumiratana S, Vunjak-Novakovic G Stem Cells Transl Med. 2012; 1(1):64-9.

PMID: 23197642 PMC: 3513763. DOI: 10.5966/sctm.2011-0020.


References
1.
Carter D . Anisotropic analysis of strain rosette information from cortical bone. J Biomech. 1978; 11(4):199-202. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(78)90013-1. View

2.
Rafferty K, Herring S . Craniofacial sutures: morphology, growth, and in vivo masticatory strains. J Morphol. 1999; 242(2):167-79. PMC: 2813870. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4687(199911)242:2<167::AID-JMOR8>3.0.CO;2-1. View

3.
Frost H . Bone "mass" and the "mechanostat": a proposal. Anat Rec. 1987; 219(1):1-9. DOI: 10.1002/ar.1092190104. View

4.
Hylander W, Johnson K . The relationship between masseter force and masseter electromyogram during mastication in the monkey Macaca fascicularis. Arch Oral Biol. 1989; 34(9):713-22. DOI: 10.1016/0003-9969(89)90078-2. View

5.
Beaupre G, ORR T, Carter D . An approach for time-dependent bone modeling and remodeling--theoretical development. J Orthop Res. 1990; 8(5):651-61. DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100080506. View