» Articles » PMID: 10860968

Reproductive Systems and Evolution in Vascular Plants

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2000 Jun 22
PMID 10860968
Citations 59
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Differences in the frequency with which offspring are produced asexually, through self-fertilization and through sexual outcrossing, are a predominant influence on the genetic structure of plant populations. Selfers and asexuals have fewer genotypes within populations than outcrossers with similar allele frequencies, and more genetic diversity in selfers and asexuals is a result of differences among populations than in sexual outcrossers. As a result of reduced levels of diversity, selfers and asexuals may be less able to respond adaptively to changing environments, and because genotypes are not mixed across family lineages, their populations may accumulate deleterious mutations more rapidly. Such differences suggest that selfing and asexual lineages may be evolutionarily short-lived and could explain why they often seem to be of recent origin. Nonetheless, the origin and maintenance of different reproductive modes must be linked to individual-level properties of survival and reproduction. Sexual outcrossers suffer from a cost of outcrossing that arises because they do not contribute to selfed or asexual progeny, whereas selfers and asexuals may contribute to outcrossed progeny. Selfing and asexual reproduction also may allow reproduction when circumstances reduce opportunities for a union of gametes produced by different individuals, a phenomenon known as reproductive assurance. Both the cost of outcrossing and reproductive assurance lead to an over-representation of selfers and asexuals in newly formed progeny, and unless sexual outcrossers are more likely to survive and reproduce, they eventually will be displaced from populations in which a selfing or asexual variant arises.

Citing Articles

The Role of Reproductive Modes in Shaping Genetic Diversity in Polyploids: A Comparative Study of Selfing, Outcrossing, and Apomictic Species.

Reutemann A, Schedler M, Hojsgaard D, Brugnoli E, Zilli A, Acuna C Plants (Basel). 2025; 14(3).

PMID: 39943038 PMC: 11820972. DOI: 10.3390/plants14030476.


Rapid detection of RNase-based self-incompatibility in Lysimachia monelli (Primulaceae).

Ramanauskas K, Jimenez-Lopez F, Sanchez-Cabrera M, Escudero M, Ortiz P, Arista M Am J Bot. 2025; 112(1):e16449.

PMID: 39806558 PMC: 11744440. DOI: 10.1002/ajb2.16449.


Loss of pollinator diversity consistently reduces reproductive success for wild and cultivated plants.

Artamendi M, Martin P, Bartomeus I, Magrach A Nat Ecol Evol. 2024; 9(2):296-313.

PMID: 39663417 DOI: 10.1038/s41559-024-02595-2.


Inbreeding depression affects the growth of seedlings of an African timber species with a mixed mating reproductive system, Pericopsis elata (Harms) Meeuwen.

Angbonda D, Ilunga-Mulala C, Bourland N, Beeckman H, Boyemba F, Hatakiwe H Heredity (Edinb). 2024; 133(4):238-248.

PMID: 39090317 PMC: 11436979. DOI: 10.1038/s41437-024-00709-x.


Dominance of non-wetland-dependent pollinators in a plant community in a small natural wetland in Shimane, Japan.

Watazu T, Hiraiwa M, Inoue M, Mishima H, Ushimaru A, Hosaka T J Plant Res. 2024; 137(2):191-201.

PMID: 38206495 PMC: 10899375. DOI: 10.1007/s10265-023-01518-9.


References
1.
Schoen D, Brown A . Intraspecific variation in population gene diversity and effective population size correlates with the mating system in plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991; 88(10):4494-7. PMC: 51687. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.88.10.4494. View

2.
Kohn J, Barrett S . POLLEN DISCOUNTING AND THE SPREAD OF A SELFING VARIANT IN TRISTYLOUS EICHHORNIA PANICULATA: EVIDENCE FROM EXPERIMENTAL POPULATIONS. Evolution. 2017; 48(5):1576-1594. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1994.tb02197.x. View

3.
Lynch M, Gabriel W . MUTATION LOAD AND THE SURVIVAL OF SMALL POPULATIONS. Evolution. 2017; 44(7):1725-1737. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb05244.x. View

4.
Schultz S, Willis J . Individual variation in inbreeding depression: the roles of inbreeding history and mutation. Genetics. 1995; 141(3):1209-23. PMC: 1206842. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/141.3.1209. View

5.
Lande R, Schemske D, Schultz S . HIGH INBREEDING DEPRESSION, SELECTIVE INTERFERENCE AMONG LOCI, AND THE THRESHOLD SELFING RATE FOR PURGING RECESSIVE LETHAL MUTATIONS. Evolution. 2017; 48(4):965-978. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1994.tb05286.x. View