» Articles » PMID: 10855549

Relationship Between Sphincter Morphology on Endoanal MRI and Histopathological Aspects of the External Anal Sphincter

Overview
Date 2000 Jun 16
PMID 10855549
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Atrophy of the external anal sphincter can be shown only on endoanal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Until now no study has compared the morphological endoanal MRI findings with histopathological aspects of the external anal sphincter. The aim of this study was to validate the MRI interpretation of the external anal sphincter using histology as a "gold standard." In this prospective study 25 consecutive unselected women (median age 48 years, range 27-72) with fecal incontinence due to obstetric trauma were assessed preoperatively with endoanal MRI. All patients underwent anterior sphincteroplasty within 6 months of the preoperative assessment. During sphincter repair, a biopsy specimen was taken both from the left and right lateral parts of the external anal sphincter. Interpretation of MRI was performed by one of the radiologists (J.S.), and biopsy specimens were evaluated by the pathologist (W.J.M.). Both were blinded to the interpretation of the other. MRI revealed external anal sphincter atrophy in 9 of the 25 patients (36%). Histopathological investigation confirmed these findings in all but one. In one additional patient atrophy was detected on histological investigation while the morphology of the external anal sphincter was classified as normal on MRI. In detecting sphincter atrophy endoanal MRI showed 89% sensitivity, 94% specificity, 89% positive predictive value, and 94% negative predictive value. MRI correctly identified sphincter morphology in 23 of 25 cases (92%). This study demonstrates that endoanal MRI accurately identifies normal and abnormal external anal sphincter morphology. Endoanal MRI is therefore a valuable preoperative diagnostic tool.

Citing Articles

Clinical symptoms related to anal sphincter defects and atrophy on external phased-array MR imaging.

Kessels I, Futterer J, Sultan A, Kluivers K Int Urogynecol J. 2015; 26(11):1619-27.

PMID: 26040812 PMC: 4611013. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-015-2743-4.


Evaluation of anal incontinence: minimal approach, maximal effectiveness.

Papaconstantinou H Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2009; 18(1):9-16.

PMID: 20011334 PMC: 2780134. DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-864076.


Anorectal morphology and function: analysis of the Shafik legacy.

Zbar A, Guo M, Pescatori M Tech Coloproctol. 2008; 12(3):191-200.

PMID: 18679577 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-008-0417-7.


Pelvic floor muscle lesions at endoanal MR imaging in female patients with faecal incontinence.

Terra M, Beets-Tan R, Vervoorn I, Deutekom M, Wasser M, Witkamp T Eur Radiol. 2008; 18(9):1892-901.

PMID: 18389245 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-008-0951-8.


Diagnostic precision of endoanal MRI in the detection of anal sphincter pathology: a meta-analysis.

Tan E, Anstee A, Koh D, Gedroyc W, Tekkis P Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008; 23(6):641-51.

PMID: 18330582 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-008-0449-5.